Improved Woodstove Project 2 in Udaipur
GS-3856 ↗ · current registry ID: GS11855
#721of 1329 in Industrial#666of 975 in India#1077of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
The Improved Woodstove Project 2 in Udaipur is a Gold Standard energy-efficiency project with VVB-confirmed additionality and a quantified 5% leakage deduction, but it is severely undermined by an extensive list of material findings including errors in ER calculations, data transfer mistakes, unit inconsistencies, and a baseline household-count mismatch (15,000 vs 18,951). The volume of corrective actions (over 30 items) and multiple cross-document contradictions in ERR figures, FNRB method, and leakage treatment indicate significant data-quality and documentation weaknesses that erode confidence in the reported credits.
Red Flags
- Multiple errors in ER calculations and data transfer to the ER sheet identified in the 2026 verification report, raising fundamental questions about credit validity
- Baseline NRB consumption referenced 15,000 households while the project reported 18,951 households — a 26% discrepancy in the baseline denominator
- Over 30 corrective actions required across the verification cycle, including missing fuel-wood consumption data, missing repair/replacement records, and missing distribution dates for ~500 stoves
- Contradiction in FNRB method: local field measurement (2026 VR) vs national default (2025 MR) — the basis of the emission factor is inconsistent across documents
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 27,630 | 27,630 | 0 | |
| 2023 | 38,990 | 38,211 | 779 | |
| 2024 | 40,086 | 0 | 40,086 | |
| Total | 106,706 | 65,841 | 40,865 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed but test type not specified
avoidance project
5% quantified deduction applied
Project-specific; reassessment timing not stated
FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →