Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
ScoredGSBiogas - ElectricityIndiaRegistry: Registered

Installation of Biogas Plant by INSEDA Members & Partners

Developer: First Climate Markets AG

GS-1140 ↗ · current registry ID: GS666

#166of 525 in Biogas#1446of 2807 in India#864of 2172 in Gold Standard (GS)

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.2 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

Installation of Biogas Plant by INSEDA Members & Partners (India) installs household biodigesters whose biogas replaces fossil fuels or biomass used for domestic energy (household anaerobic biodigesters (capacities 1 m3, 2 m3, 3 m3, 4 m3, 6 m3) where biogas is used for domestic cooking purposes and residue is used as organic fertilizer) under GS methodology- Indicative programme, baseline, and monitoring methodology for Small Scale Biodigester Voluntary Gold Standard; registry status Registered (GS), 228,805 credits issued (vintages 2009–2019). The documents name Det Norske Veritas as validation / verification body. The documents estimate 24,170 tCO2e per year. Credits were issued per the registry; no monitoring or verification report is among the documents read.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 5 registry documents (5 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit VintagesExhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
8,4648,4640
2010
23,76323,7630
2011
23,62923,6290
2012
23,45023,4500
2013
23,31523,3150
2014
23,19423,1940
2015
23,16623,1660
2016
23,20023,2000
2017
23,17823,1780
2018
21,34321,3430
2019
12,10312,1030
Total228,805228,8050

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceGeneral Methodologyv2.2

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →