Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Re-assessment pendingVCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)UgandaRegistry: RegisteredAMS-I.D

Ishasha 6.6 MW Small Hydropower Project

Developer: Eco Power Uganda Limited

VCS-1286 ↗

#2805of 5087 in Renewable energy#84of 185 in Uganda#1048of 1608 in Verra (VCS)#1013of 2004 in AMS-I.D

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 2 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.3 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Analysis

The Ishasha 6.6 MW small hydropower project in Uganda has confirmed additionality (barrier test, VVB-verified) and no reversal events, but is undermined by an unaddressed 0% leakage deduction in the latest verification, a project-specific baseline, a grid emission factor frozen at 2008 values, and 16 outstanding corrective actions. Multiple contradictions between the verification and monitoring reports—particularly on baseline method, FPIC, and safeguards—erode confidence in the data record. The project is not CORSIA-eligible, which limits dual-channel risk, but the overall documentation quality and baseline conservatism warrant caution.

Red Flags

4 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 2 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 4 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 25 registry documents (25 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMAMS-I.D

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-25

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2015
16,10416,1040
2016
16,82216,8220
2017
10,97010,9700
2018
27,72827,7280
2020
7,11607,116
2021
1,39801,398
Total80,13871,6248,514

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2011–2012AMS-I.D v17.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2015AMS-I.D v17.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2016–2018AMS-I.D v17.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2018–2020AMS-I.D v17.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2020–2021ACM0008version not stated in the document

    issuance document

  6. 2020–2021AMS-I.D v17.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0008: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
  • AMS-I.D: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAMS-I.D.

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →