Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Re-assessment pendingCSIGlobal Artisan C-SinkCambodiaRegistry: RegisteredCSI-ARTISAN-C-SINK

Leopa Bamboo Biochar

Developer: Leopa Bamboo Co. Ltd

Methodology: CSI-ARTISAN-C-SINK (CSI)

GCSP-1077 ↗

#153of 180 in Biochar#24of 26 in Cambodia#102of 122 in Global C-Sink#39of 53 in CSI-ARTISAN-C-SINK

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 26 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 4.2 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

How this analysis was made

Standard
Global C-Sink
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v2.1 · analysed on 26 Sep 2026 · 7/7 registry documents analyzed · re-assessment under v2.2 pending

Analysis

The Leopa Bamboo Biochar project in Cambodia is in validation stage under Carbon Standards International's Global Artisan C-Sink methodology. Additionality is confirmed by the VVB via an investment test, but the verification report identifies 12 material findings spanning feedstock sourcing compliance, methane compensation, worker safety, and PDD gaps, all with documented corrective actions. The project has not yet issued credits, which limits immediate over-crediting risk, but the project-specific baseline, contradictory leakage justification, and unverified storage conditions warrant caution before any claims are made.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Gates applied

The gates applied to this score are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 26 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 7 registry documents (7 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish CORSIA eligibility per project.

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Carbon removal

    Takes CO₂ out of the atmosphere — the only type that can neutralise residual emissions in an SBTi net-zero claim.

    Source: project standard

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2025
15.4420.12215.32
2026
000
2027
000
2028
000
2029
000
Total15.4420.12215.32

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.