Likoni and Shimoni Improved Cook Stove Project
GS-1210 ↗ · current registry ID: GS825
#981of 1329 in Industrial#120of 157 in Kenya#1409of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
The Likoni and Shimoni cook stove project has a functional additionality test and documented safeguards, but is undermined by a 0% leakage deduction with no justification, an absent buffer pool, self-reported usage monitoring, and ten cross-document contradictions that erode confidence in the underlying data. The project delivered only about 69% of its period-specific claim, and the VVB is listed as Gold Standard itself rather than an independent verifier, raising independence concerns.
Red Flags
- Leakage deduction of 0% with justification listed as 'not addressed' in the 2016 verification report, despite the 2010 PDD having quantified a 7.54% leakage factor — a material regression in treatment
- Ten contradictions across documents, including conflicting additionality test types (investment vs. barrier), conflicting FNRB methods (national default vs. local field), and conflicting crediting period end dates
- VVB listed as 'Gold Standard' — the standard-setting body itself — rather than an independent verification body, raising a structural independence concern
- Usage monitoring method contradicted between self-report (2016 verification) and annual survey (2016 monitoring report), with no clear resolution
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1,713 | 1,713 | 0 | |
| 2012 | 1,877 | 1,877 | 0 | |
| 2013 | 1,759 | 1,759 | 0 | |
| 2014 | 2,194 | 2,151 | 43 | |
| 2015 | 2,194 | 1,371 | 823 | |
| 2016 | 547 | 537 | 10 | |
| Total | 10,284 | 9,408 | 876 |
Risk Indicators
Test present but contradicted and unverified
reversals unaddressed
0% deduction, justification not addressed
Project-specific, reassessed 2014
FPIC, grievance, benefit-sharing documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →