Montville Geauga Forest Carbon Offsets
#36of 345 in United States#19of 59 in City Forest Credits (CFC)
Audit Analysis
A CFC tree preservation project with VVB-confirmed additionality, a 10% buffer pool, and a quantified 18.3% leakage deduction, supported by a fee simple environmental covenant for 40-year permanence. The project is moderately constrained by a project-specific baseline, an individual (rather than organisational) verifier, and several documentation gaps around safeguards and FNRB. No reversal events or corrective actions were reported, and the verified ERR is conservative relative to the ex-ante lifetime estimate.
Red Flags
- Project-specific baseline method rather than a jurisdictional or standardised approach, limiting comparability and robustness
- Three material findings in the verification report, including a revision to carbon quantification for natural regeneration post-clearing and a name discrepancy in the encumbrance document
- Contradiction between the validation report (ex-ante lifetime 15,009) and the verification report (ex-ante lifetime 16,677) on the same date, indicating a quantification inconsistency between documents
- FPIC, grievance mechanism, and independent storage verification are not stated in any available document
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4,978 | 0 | 4,978 | |
| 2025 | 4,978 | 0 | 4,978 | |
| 2026 | 4,978 | 0 | 4,978 | |
| Total | 14,934 | 0 | 14,934 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
18.3% quantified deduction
Project-specific, no reassessment date
Mentioned but FPIC/grievance not detailed
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →