PAYMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SCHEME FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION OF WATER SOURCES IN THE JURISDICTION OF CORPOCHIVOR
#8of 261 in Soil carbon#8of 124 in Colombia#129of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#4of 29 in VM0015
Audit Analysis
A VCS forest management project in Colombia with a VVB-verified combined additionality test, a 17% non-permanence buffer, and no reported reversal events. However, the project-specific modeled baseline, a 0% leakage deduction (contradicting a 5% figure in the validation report), and several unresolved parameter contradictions between documents moderate confidence in the integrity and claim-safety of the credits. The project delivered approximately 115% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the elapsed monitoring period, indicating no over-crediting.
Red Flags
- Leakage deduction of 0% in the verification report contradicts a 5% deduction in the validation report; for a jurisdictional forest project, a zero leakage deduction warrants stronger justification
- Buffer pool percentage differs between documents: 17% in the verification report (2021) versus 20% in the validation report (2018), indicating a shift in non-permanence risk assessment
- Lifetime ex-ante ERR differs between the verification report (49,857 tCO2e) and an earlier appendix (63,904 tCO2e), a 22% discrepancy that affects pro-rata calculations
- Baseline is project-specific and modeled rather than measured, reducing confidence in the counterfactual
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 3,016 | 262 | 2,754 | |
| 2016 | 1,129 | 0 | 1,129 | |
| Total | 4,145 | 262 | 3,883 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-verified combined test
17% buffer, no reversals
0% deduction, contradicts 5% in validation
Project-specific, modeled, not yet due for reassessment
FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →