Planting Biodiverse Forests in Panama
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified Additionality confirmed by an independent VVB (Control Union) as noted in the verification report
missing Reversals not addressed and multiple corrective actions required (several SAC Menor items and CUC-CAR-01 listed in the verification report)
Transparency
verified VVB named and a recent baseline reassessment recorded in 2023 (verification/monitoring documents available)
inferred ✗ Total claimed ERR not found in extracted records and some monitoring fields (usage, grid EF) not stated, reducing verifiability
Claim Safety
missing Project is CORSIA-eligible which raises double-claim and market-compatibility risk (registry: Gold Standard; corsia_eligible: true)
inferred Leakage treatment is contradictory across documents (monitoring report shows leakage negligible/0% in some docs but the PDD includes a 10% deduction), increasing over-crediting risk
Documentation
verified Large document set used (24 docs referenced) including PDD, monitoring and verification reports
missing Extraction confidence is only medium and the verification report (2019) lists material findings and corrective actions — documentation recency and unresolved issues reduce score
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The verification report confirms additionality via an investment test and the project uses a project-specific baseline method; the baseline was last reassessed in 2023 (monitoring/verification documents). However, reversal treatment is incomplete — reversal events are listed as not addressed and the verification report lists multiple material findings and corrective actions (SAC Menor items and CUC-CAR-01). There are also contradictory values for buffer and leakage which weaken reliability. These issues justify a moderate integrity score.
Transparency
A named VVB (Control Union Certification B.V.), monitoring period (May–Nov 2024), and a recent baseline reassessment are present, and 386,028 tCO2e is recorded as verified removals. However, key monitoring inputs are missing from the extracted record (total ERR claimed, grid emission factor, usage monitoring method) and extraction confidence is only medium, limiting independent verification.
Claim Safety
The project is listed as CORSIA-eligible, increasing double-claim risk. Leakage treatment is inconsistent: some monitoring documents report a leakage deduction of 0% with a justification of 'deemed negligible', while the PDD records a 10% leakage deduction — this contradiction raises over-crediting concerns. The absence of quantified FNRB and usage-rate data in the record further weakens claim defensibility.
Documentation
Evidence includes PDD, monitoring and verification reports and 24 documents were used, which indicates substantial documentation. Minimum extraction confidence is medium, though, and the most recent verification report in the extracted record dates from 2019; material findings and several corrective actions remain open. These factors reduce the documentation score.
Overall
I privileged the more conservative or higher-quality document values where contradictions mattered: for buffer pool percentage I privileged the verification report value of 20% (verification_report dated 2016) over an undocumented lower-priority source because the verification report is a higher-priority evidence source in the extract. For leakage deduction I privileged the PDD value of 10% (PDD dated 2023) as the PDD explicitly prescribes leakage treatment and is more recent than the 2020 monitoring document reporting 0%; this conservative choice lowers confidence in credited volumes. For additionality test type I privileged the PDD's stated investment test (PDD 2023) over older, unsure records because the PDD is the primary project design document. For the crediting period I used the monitoring report's updated range (1995–2024) from the 2025 monitoring document as the most recent authoritative statement. These contradictions — unresolved differences between monitoring, PDD and verification documents and some missing quantified inputs — reduce scores across dimensions, particularly claim safety and documentation. Overall weighted score (integrity 35%, transparency 25%, claim safety 25%, documentation 15%) is 4.9. Note: the gate rules will be applied after this scoring (documentation <3.0 or integrity <4.0 caps).
Audit Analysis
Project shows some integrity elements (VVB-confirmed additionality, a recent baseline reassessment) but has material findings and corrective actions outstanding, contradictory leakage and buffer information, and CORSIA exposure. Documentation is adequate in volume but has extraction-confidence and dated-document issues that reduce trust.
Project Description
By sourcing timber from primary rainforest or harvesting large-scale monoculture plantation, the timber trade has significantly depleted tropical rainforests. Tropical Mix is looking to change that by introducing sustainable timber production while reforesting degraded pastureland with a mix of native tree species and teak. The resulting forests offer a natural habitat for native animals and plants, protect and enrich the soil, save and filter water and contribute to the mitigation of climate change. The project, initially developed by Forest Finance and recently extended by the partner Sustainable Timber and Isla Cebaco, is based on a model that combines sustainable, high quality timber production with biodiversity protection and ecosystem restoration. By also planting a mix of cacao and native tree species in some areas, the project also enables sustainable cacao production. Project impacts and benefits: More than 7.5 million trees from 20 different native species have been planted – capturing carbon and migating climate change 25% has been declared nature reserve , protecting the forest and the animals and plants living there 15 threatened animal species from the Red List have found a habitat in the project The reforested areas serve as bridges for wandering animals seeking new habitats The project provides long-term employment for the local population. So far, the Forest Finance Group has created 150 jobs , through their reforestation projects in Panama. The training and further education of the native population leads to an improved living standard. Knowledge transfer around the use of sustainable and innovative forest management technologies, GIS and monitoring-systems in Panama lays the ground for future projects All employees receive a wage above the legal minimum , health insurance and a pension fund . Furthermore, they receive additional optional benefits such as a life insurance as a
Red Flags
- Contradictory leakage treatment: 0% deduction reported in some docs vs 10% in the PDD
- Material findings and required corrective actions (SAC Menor items and CUC-CAR-01) remain in the record
- Project flagged as CORSIA-eligible, increasing double-claim risk
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 5,740 | 0 | 5,740 | |
| 2012 | 112,662 | 14,154 | 98,508 | |
| 2014 | 43,206 | 38,412 | 4,794 | |
| 2015 | 49,274 | 36,081 | 13,193 | |
| 2016 | 66,387 | 66,387 | 0 | |
| 2017 | 67,230 | 67,194 | 36 | |
| 2018 | 67,927 | 67,927 | 0 | |
| 2019 | 72,343 | 36,940 | 35,403 | |
| 2020 | 216,476 | 109,851 | 106,625 | |
| 2021 | 216,470 | 58,898 | 157,572 | |
| 2022 | 216,425 | 87,664 | 128,761 | |
| 2023 | 191,385 | 311 | 191,074 | |
| 2024 | 81,150 | 0 | 81,150 | |
| Total | 1,406,675 | 583,819 | 822,856 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Resolve contradictions by publishing a reconciled statement (preferably a verification addendum) that confirms buffer %, leakage deduction and crediting period with supporting justification.
- Close the listed corrective actions and re-verify the issues in a follow-up verification so reversal risk and material findings are demonstrably addressed.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
buffer present but reversals not fully addressed
contradictory leakage treatment (0% vs 10%)
project-specific baseline, reassessed 2023
FPIC and safeguards mentioned; some gaps
CORSIA-eligible — double-claim risk
Where to buy
Marketplaces
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →