Vai al contenuto principale
GS removal Vintage 2017 Registry: Certified & crediting Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

Planting Biodiverse Forests in Panama

GS-1796 ↗

4.9 / 10
Integrity
5.2
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
4.8

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified Additionality confirmed by an independent VVB (Control Union) as noted in the verification report

missing Reversals not addressed and multiple corrective actions required (several SAC Menor items and CUC-CAR-01 listed in the verification report)

Transparency

verified VVB named and a recent baseline reassessment recorded in 2023 (verification/monitoring documents available)

inferred ✗ Total claimed ERR not found in extracted records and some monitoring fields (usage, grid EF) not stated, reducing verifiability

Claim Safety

missing Project is CORSIA-eligible which raises double-claim and market-compatibility risk (registry: Gold Standard; corsia_eligible: true)

inferred Leakage treatment is contradictory across documents (monitoring report shows leakage negligible/0% in some docs but the PDD includes a 10% deduction), increasing over-crediting risk

Documentation

verified Large document set used (24 docs referenced) including PDD, monitoring and verification reports

missing Extraction confidence is only medium and the verification report (2019) lists material findings and corrective actions — documentation recency and unresolved issues reduce score

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The verification report confirms additionality via an investment test and the project uses a project-specific baseline method; the baseline was last reassessed in 2023 (monitoring/verification documents). However, reversal treatment is incomplete — reversal events are listed as not addressed and the verification report lists multiple material findings and corrective actions (SAC Menor items and CUC-CAR-01). There are also contradictory values for buffer and leakage which weaken reliability. These issues justify a moderate integrity score.

Transparency

A named VVB (Control Union Certification B.V.), monitoring period (May–Nov 2024), and a recent baseline reassessment are present, and 386,028 tCO2e is recorded as verified removals. However, key monitoring inputs are missing from the extracted record (total ERR claimed, grid emission factor, usage monitoring method) and extraction confidence is only medium, limiting independent verification.

Claim Safety

The project is listed as CORSIA-eligible, increasing double-claim risk. Leakage treatment is inconsistent: some monitoring documents report a leakage deduction of 0% with a justification of 'deemed negligible', while the PDD records a 10% leakage deduction — this contradiction raises over-crediting concerns. The absence of quantified FNRB and usage-rate data in the record further weakens claim defensibility.

Documentation

Evidence includes PDD, monitoring and verification reports and 24 documents were used, which indicates substantial documentation. Minimum extraction confidence is medium, though, and the most recent verification report in the extracted record dates from 2019; material findings and several corrective actions remain open. These factors reduce the documentation score.

Overall

I privileged the more conservative or higher-quality document values where contradictions mattered: for buffer pool percentage I privileged the verification report value of 20% (verification_report dated 2016) over an undocumented lower-priority source because the verification report is a higher-priority evidence source in the extract. For leakage deduction I privileged the PDD value of 10% (PDD dated 2023) as the PDD explicitly prescribes leakage treatment and is more recent than the 2020 monitoring document reporting 0%; this conservative choice lowers confidence in credited volumes. For additionality test type I privileged the PDD's stated investment test (PDD 2023) over older, unsure records because the PDD is the primary project design document. For the crediting period I used the monitoring report's updated range (1995–2024) from the 2025 monitoring document as the most recent authoritative statement. These contradictions — unresolved differences between monitoring, PDD and verification documents and some missing quantified inputs — reduce scores across dimensions, particularly claim safety and documentation. Overall weighted score (integrity 35%, transparency 25%, claim safety 25%, documentation 15%) is 4.9. Note: the gate rules will be applied after this scoring (documentation <3.0 or integrity <4.0 caps).

Audit Analysis

Project shows some integrity elements (VVB-confirmed additionality, a recent baseline reassessment) but has material findings and corrective actions outstanding, contradictory leakage and buffer information, and CORSIA exposure. Documentation is adequate in volume but has extraction-confidence and dated-document issues that reduce trust.

Project Description

By sourcing timber from primary rainforest or harvesting large-scale monoculture plantation, the timber trade has significantly depleted tropical rainforests. Tropical Mix is looking to change that by introducing sustainable timber production while reforesting degraded pastureland with a mix of native tree species and teak. The resulting forests offer a natural habitat for native animals and plants, protect and enrich the soil, save and filter water and contribute to the mitigation of climate change. The project, initially developed by Forest Finance and recently extended by the partner Sustainable Timber and Isla Cebaco, is based on a model that combines sustainable, high quality timber production with biodiversity protection and ecosystem restoration. By also planting a mix of cacao and native tree species in some areas, the project also enables sustainable cacao production. Project impacts and benefits: More than   7.5 million trees  from   20 different native species   have been planted – capturing carbon and migating climate change 25%   has been   declared nature reserve , protecting the forest and the animals and plants living there 15 threatened animal species   from the Red List have   found a habitat   in the project The reforested areas serve as bridges for wandering animals seeking new habitats The project provides long-term employment for the local population. So far, the Forest Finance Group has   created 150 jobs , through their reforestation projects in Panama. The training and further education of the native population leads to an improved living standard. Knowledge transfer   around the use of sustainable and innovative forest management technologies, GIS and monitoring-systems in Panama lays the ground for future projects All employees   receive a wage above the legal minimum ,   health insurance   and a   pension fund . Furthermore, they receive additional optional benefits such as a life insurance as a

Red Flags

  • Contradictory leakage treatment: 0% deduction reported in some docs vs 10% in the PDD
  • Material findings and required corrective actions (SAC Menor items and CUC-CAR-01) remain in the record
  • Project flagged as CORSIA-eligible, increasing double-claim risk

Credit Vintages

Issued Retired Available
2011
5,740 0 5,740
2012
112,662 14,154 98,508
2014
43,206 38,412 4,794
2015
49,274 36,081 13,193
2016
66,387 66,387 0
2017
67,230 67,194 36
2018
67,927 67,927 0
2019
72,343 36,940 35,403
2020
216,476 109,851 106,625
2021
216,470 58,898 157,572
2022
216,425 87,664 128,761
2023
191,385 311 191,074
2024
81,150 0 81,150
Total 1,406,675 583,819 822,856

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Resolve contradictions by publishing a reconciled statement (preferably a verification addendum) that confirms buffer %, leakage deduction and crediting period with supporting justification.
  • Close the listed corrective actions and re-verify the issues in a follow-up verification so reversal risk and material findings are demonstrably addressed.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

buffer present but reversals not fully addressed

Leakage

contradictory leakage treatment (0% vs 10%)

Baseline

project-specific baseline, reassessed 2023

Safeguards

FPIC and safeguards mentioned; some gaps

Double-claim

CORSIA-eligible — double-claim risk

Where to buy

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-23 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti