Skip to main content
CCLand use (AFOLU)ColombiaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Programa de Compensaciones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero (GEI) – Reforestadora Cacerí S.A.

ECO-32 ↗

#55of 124 in Colombia#44of 99 in CerCarbono (CC)

5.1/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

A Colombian reforestation project under the CerCarbono standard with VVB-confirmed additionality and a 15% buffer pool, but undermined by serious land-tenure disputes affecting 8 of 12 properties, two still-open significant adverse findings, and a weak 0% leakage justification. The project over-delivers relative to its ex-ante estimate, which is reassuring for claim safety, yet the FNRB discrepancy between the PDD and validation report and the absence of documented safeguards and FPIC processes leave material gaps in the project's environmental and social integrity.

Red Flags

  • Land tenure not assured for 8 of 12 properties due to embargoes, land restitution annotations, and 'falsa tradición' claims — a fundamental eligibility risk for a land-based credit project
  • Two Significant Adverse Findings (SAF1: unresolved land tenure; SAF2: failure to register first-period credits in RENARE) remain open from verification No. 2
  • Illegal mining deforestation detected near parcel 90 (Finca Santa Isabel), directly threatening the eligible area
  • Safeguards documentation is contradictory within the same verification report (stated both as present and absent), and FPIC / grievance mechanism are not found in any extracted document
  • FNRB value differs by a factor of two between the PDD (0.22) and the validation report (0.47), creating uncertainty about the true removal rate

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2017
2,75702,757
2018
5,51505,515
2019
5,51505,515
2020
9200920
2021
5,58205,582
2022
3,25803,258
Total23,547023,547

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test confirmed by VVB Icontec

Permanence

reversal risk not fully quantified

Leakage

0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' without quantified analysis

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; no reassessment date recorded

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, and safeguards not documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents