Skip to main content
VCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources); Waste handling and disposalBrazil Registry: RegisteredACM0001

QUATÁ LANDFILL GAS PROJECT

VCS-3928 ↗

#102of 189 in Methane#124of 211 in Brazil#925of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#94of 159 in ACM0001

4.7/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

The QUATÁ Landfill Gas Project is a VCS-registered LFG destruction project with a solid additionality case (investment test confirmed by Applus+ Certification) and a reasonable permanence argument based on methane destruction. However, a significant grid emission factor discrepancy between the PDD (0.2252 tCO₂e/MWh) and the validation report (1.3 tCO₂e/MWh) raises baseline validity concerns, and the project-specific modeled baseline adds uncertainty. Documentation quality was flagged by four corrective action requests (all resolved), and the low extraction confidence across nine source documents limits assurance.

Red Flags

  • Grid emission factor differs by a factor of ~5.8 between the PDD (0.2252) and the validation report (1.3 tCO₂e/MWh), creating material uncertainty in the energy-displacement component of the credit calculation
  • The PDD originally claimed 726,115 tCO₂e while the validation report validated 598,117 tCO₂e — a 17.6% reduction that, combined with the grid EF discrepancy, suggests parameter inconsistencies across documents
  • Leakage deduction is 0% with only a 'deemed negligible' justification; no quantified leakage analysis is documented
  • Minimum extraction confidence across the nine source documents is rated low, reducing assurance in the extracted data

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test; capture not legally required

Permanence

Methane destroyed on-site; no storage or reversal risk

Leakage

0% deduction; 'deemed negligible' without quantified analysis

Baseline

Project-specific modeled baseline; grid EF discrepancy across documents

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism present; FPIC not conducted; safeguards mentioned but not detailed

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03ACM0001

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents