Skip to main content
CFCUrban Forest CarbonUnited StatesGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Richmond Forest Carbon Offsets

CFC-richmond-forest-carbon-offsets ↗

#138of 345 in United States#49of 59 in City Forest Credits (CFC)

5.3/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
6.0

Audit Analysis

The Richmond Forest Carbon Offsets project is a tree-preservation credit under the City Forest Credits standard with VVB-confirmed additionality and a 10% buffer pool, but it carries notable weaknesses: a project-specific baseline with no recorded reassessment, a 0% leakage deduction justified only as 'deemed negligible,' and a covenant that permits tree removal for hazards or health. Safeguards documentation is essentially absent, and the very short initial monitoring window limits confidence in long-term delivery.

Red Flags

  • Leakage deduction of 0% is justified only as 'deemed negligible' with no quantitative analysis, which is thin for a tree-preservation project where displaced removal could occur elsewhere.
  • The verification report notes the covenant allows tree removal for hazards or health and flags risk of insufficient regeneration from invasive ivy or understory clearing, yet no corrective actions were required and reversal risk is not explicitly managed beyond the covenant.
  • No FPIC, no grievance mechanism, and no safeguards documentation were found in any available document, leaving community and stakeholder protections unverified.
  • Baseline is project-specific with no recorded reassessment date; while not yet overdue under the standard's cadence, the absence of any reassessment record limits confidence in baseline validity over the 40-year crediting period.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2020
4,15104,151
2021
1,2251,001224
Total5,3761,0014,375

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

reversal risk not explicitly managed

Leakage

0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' only

Baseline

Project-specific; no reassessment date recorded

Safeguards

No FPIC, grievance, or safeguards documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents