CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredVCSForestryIndonesiaVintage 2014Registry: Verification overdueVM0004

Rimba Raya Biodiversity Reserve Project

Developer: InfiniteEARTH

VCS-674 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#239of 432 in Water#49of 123 in Indonesia#1029of 1608 in Verra (VCS)

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.3 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-25medium confidenceLatest verified period ends: 2019-06-30

evidence: 38/40 registry documents read · 0 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

Rimba Raya Biodiversity Reserve Project (Indonesia) avoids the planned conversion of peat swamp forest (VM0004) under VM0004 v1.0; registry status Verification overdue (VCS), 33,625,616 credits issued (vintages 2009–2019). The documents name AENOR INTERNACIONAL S.A.U as validation / verification body. The latest verification report (2017-06-23 – 2019-06-30) verifies 6,890,938 tCO2e.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 40 registry documents (38 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: methodology

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-25

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
1,090,6761,090,6760
2010
2,305,2372,305,2370
2011
2,584,0192,167,524416,495
2012
3,035,7532,281,601754,152
2013
3,862,9412,865,359997,582
2014
4,294,1353,363,252930,883
2015
3,925,2723,453,381471,891
2016
3,493,7222,158,7961,334,601
2017
3,953,9002,347,8971,606,003
2018
3,403,0663,221,565176,649
2019
1,676,8951,676,8950
Total33,625,61626,932,1836,688,256

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2009–2010VM0004 v1.0since replaced by v2.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2010–2013VM0004 v1.0since replaced by v2.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2013–2014VM0004 v1.0since replaced by v2.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2014–2017VM0004 v1.0since replaced by v2.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2017–2019VM0004 v1.0since replaced by v2.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. Period not statedVM0004 v1.0since replaced by v2.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  • VM0004: Withdrawn (Verra / Verified Carbon Standard) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+564)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

Marketplaces

Carbonmarksold out

~7/tCO2

Vintage 2014

checked on 25 Oct 2026

↗
+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceVM0004 v1.0
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →