Skip to main content
CCLand use (AFOLU), Land use (AFOLU), Land use (AFOLU), Land use (AFOLU)BrazilGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Rio Maicimirim REDD+ Project

ECO-144 ↗

#4of 99 in REDD+#2of 211 in Brazil#1of 99 in CerCarbono (CC)

6.6/ 10
Integrity
6.8
Transparency
6.2
Claim Safety
6.5
Documentation
6.8

Audit Analysis

The Rio Maicimirim REDD+ project demonstrates solid structural integrity with a VVB-verified combined additionality test, an 11.7% buffer pool, and no reversal events over a five-year monitoring period. However, a contradiction between project-specific and jurisdictional baseline methods, an unstated leakage deduction percentage, and missing FNRB data introduce moderate uncertainty. The verified emissions reductions (2.50 million tCO₂e) represent approximately 90.5% of the pro-rata lifetime expectation for the elapsed period, indicating conservative delivery.

Red Flags

  • Baseline method contradiction: the monitoring report (Jan 2024) states a project-specific baseline while the validation report (same date) references a jurisdictional baseline — the basis for quantification is ambiguous
  • Leakage is described as 'quantified' in the verification report but the actual deduction percentage is not stated in any available document
  • FNRB value and method are not stated in any extracted document, leaving the forest reference level unverifiable
  • 28 Corrective Action Requests were raised during validation and verification, indicating a non-trivial number of documentation or methodological issues that had to be resolved

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2017
99099
2018
3940394
2019
5350535
2020
7750775
2021
9310931
2022
6100610
Total3,34403,344

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

No reversals; 11.7% buffer pool

Leakage

Quantified but magnitude unstated

Baseline

Project-specific; method contradiction

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, safeguards documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents