Safe Water Programme – Kenya - VPA 50

Audit Analysis

The Safe Water Programme in Kenya has a VVB-confirmed combined additionality test and documented safeguards, but is undermined by a project-specific baseline, a weak 'deemed negligible' leakage justification, and six corrective actions addressing fundamental monitoring methodology gaps (sampling bias, operational-day tracking, population confirmation). The absence of a verified ERR figure and a buffer pool, combined with a significant discrepancy between claimed and lower ERR values across documents, limits confidence in the credit quantity.

Project Description

Red Flags

• ⚠Six corrective actions required by the VVB, including non-compliant sampling methodology (FAR#1), potential systemic bias in chlorine tablet usage inflating ERs (FAR#2), and missing signed population confirmation letters from schools
• ⚠Total ERR claimed of 1,023,164 in the monitoring report contradicts a figure of 298,090 in an earlier document; the verified ERR is not stated in the extracted record, preventing independent confirmation
• ⚠Leakage deduction of 0% justified only as 'deemed negligible' in the monitoring report, while the PDD references a 'quantified' approach — an unresolved inconsistency

Credit Vintages