Safe Water Programme – Kenya - VPA 53

Audit Analysis

The Safe Water Programme in Kenya has a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and no reported reversal events, but is undermined by an unaddressed leakage justification, a project-specific baseline with no reassessment record, absence of FPIC, and eight corrective actions flagged by the verifier. The verification report itself notes that actual emission reductions are lower than the ex-ante PDD estimates, and several contradictions across documents (ERR figures, FNRB method, crediting period) reduce confidence in the data. Overall, the project shows moderate design quality but significant implementation and documentation gaps.

Project Description

Red Flags

• ⚠Leakage deduction of 0% with justification recorded as 'not addressed' in the verification report (Sep 2024), while the monitoring report (Sep 2024) claims it was 'deemed negligible' — the higher-priority verification report does not support the claim.
• ⚠Eight corrective actions required by the VVB, including stratified random sampling deficiencies, potential systemic bias in chlorine tablet usage, missing population confirmation letters, and missing SDG 6 indicator in the VPA-DD.
• ⚠Temporal inconsistency: the verification report is dated 21 Sep 2024 yet the stated monitoring period is 1–31 Dec 2024, meaning the report predates the period it purports to verify.
• ⚠FPIC was not conducted (explicitly recorded as false), despite the project serving students and staff at institutions in Kenya.
• ⚠Crediting period discrepancy: the verification report states 2021-01-01 to 2025-12-31 while the PDD states 2023-04-01 to 2028-04-01, creating uncertainty about the valid crediting window.

Credit Vintages