Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticIndiaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Smokeless Energy efficient cookstoves distribution in Rural India-2

GS-4167 ↗ · current registry ID: GS12018

#930of 1329 in Industrial#782of 975 in India#1357of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.5/ 10
Integrity
4.8
Transparency
4.2
Claim Safety
4.8
Documentation
3.8

Audit Analysis

This Gold Standard cookstove project in rural India has VVB-confirmed additionality and a quantified 5% leakage deduction, but is undermined by 28 corrective actions spanning data consistency, methodology application, and project boundary issues. The verified emissions reduction (31,255 tCO2e) represents only about 81% of the pro-rata expectation for the monitoring period, and the assumed usage rate of 1.0 was verified at just 0.82, indicating a meaningful over-estimation risk. Eight contradictions between the verification report and monitoring report further erode confidence in the reported figures.

Red Flags

  • 28 corrective actions required in the verification report, including inconsistencies in ERR calculations, SDG indicators, project boundary, fNRB justification, and double-counting prevention for two projects at the same location
  • Assumed usage rate of 1.0 verified at only 0.82, a 18% gap that directly inflates claimed emissions reductions
  • No buffer pool percentage stated for a cookstove project where cookstove abandonment or breakage creates inherent reversal risk
  • Eight contradictions between the verification report and monitoring report across ERR figures, fNRB method, crediting period, safeguards status, and usage monitoring method
  • CORSIA eligibility and CCP status both not stated in available documents, leaving dual-channel risk unassessed

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2022
17,57417,5740
2023
34,52834,398130
2024
33,20233,2020
2025
18,154018,154
Total103,45885,17418,284

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

cookstove reversal risk unaddressed

Leakage

5% quantified deduction applied

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; reassessment timing not stated

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance mechanism present but 28 corrective actions flag safeguarding gaps

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both not stated; dual-channel risk unassessed

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-06General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents