Smokeless Energy efficient cookstoves distribution in Rural India-2
GS-4167 ↗ · current registry ID: GS12018
#930of 1329 in Industrial#782of 975 in India#1357of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
This Gold Standard cookstove project in rural India has VVB-confirmed additionality and a quantified 5% leakage deduction, but is undermined by 28 corrective actions spanning data consistency, methodology application, and project boundary issues. The verified emissions reduction (31,255 tCO2e) represents only about 81% of the pro-rata expectation for the monitoring period, and the assumed usage rate of 1.0 was verified at just 0.82, indicating a meaningful over-estimation risk. Eight contradictions between the verification report and monitoring report further erode confidence in the reported figures.
Red Flags
- 28 corrective actions required in the verification report, including inconsistencies in ERR calculations, SDG indicators, project boundary, fNRB justification, and double-counting prevention for two projects at the same location
- Assumed usage rate of 1.0 verified at only 0.82, a 18% gap that directly inflates claimed emissions reductions
- No buffer pool percentage stated for a cookstove project where cookstove abandonment or breakage creates inherent reversal risk
- Eight contradictions between the verification report and monitoring report across ERR figures, fNRB method, crediting period, safeguards status, and usage monitoring method
- CORSIA eligibility and CCP status both not stated in available documents, leaving dual-channel risk unassessed
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 17,574 | 17,574 | 0 | |
| 2023 | 34,528 | 34,398 | 130 | |
| 2024 | 33,202 | 33,202 | 0 | |
| 2025 | 18,154 | 0 | 18,154 | |
| Total | 103,458 | 85,174 | 18,284 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
cookstove reversal risk unaddressed
5% quantified deduction applied
Project-specific baseline; reassessment timing not stated
FPIC and grievance mechanism present but 28 corrective actions flag safeguarding gaps
CORSIA and CCP status both not stated; dual-channel risk unassessed
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →