The Carbon Farming Program of Lithuania
#155of 261 in Soil carbon#1020of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#13of 25 in VM0042
Audit Analysis
The Carbon Farming Program of Lithuania is a soil-carbon AFOLU project with VVB-confirmed additionality and a 12% buffer pool, but it is undermined by extensive material findings (24 non-conformity reports, 56 information requests), a retroactive modelling approach that prevents ground-truth correction, and a 59% reduction in the lifetime ex-ante estimate between PDD revisions. The project's reliance on a project-specific RothC-based model with validation criteria unmet for four of five scenarios creates meaningful over-crediting risk that the buffer pool only partially mitigates.
Red Flags
- The project is retroactive (modelling backwards from 2023 to 2020), meaning overestimations in soil carbon sequestration cannot be corrected by ground-truthing, as noted in the verification report.
- Validation criteria per VMD0053 Box 5 are not met for 4 out of 5 crop-farming-group × practice-change scenarios, as flagged in the verification report.
- The lifetime ex-ante estimate was reduced from approximately 1.6 million tCO₂e (PDD, September 2023) to 651,365 tCO₂e (PDD, March 2026), a 59% reduction that signals significant initial overestimation.
- 24 Non-Conformity Reports and 56 New Information Requests were raised and closed during verification, indicating pervasive documentation and methodological deficiencies.
- The conservation tillage definition was found to be inconsistent with the cited Hyun and Yoo (2024) TRM applicability criteria, and Tillage Rate Modifiers were deemed inappropriate for the project's defined practice change.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 14,935 | 2,300 | 12,635 | |
| 2021 | 10,135 | 0 | 10,135 | |
| 2022 | 12,738 | 0 | 12,738 | |
| 2023 | 7,827 | 0 | 7,827 | |
| Total | 45,635 | 2,300 | 43,335 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed common-practice test
12% buffer, no reversals, but retroactive modelling and insufficient non-permanence risk scoring
0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' in MVR but not addressed in later validation report
Project-specific baseline; reassessment not yet due under VCS 10-year rule
FPIC and grievance mechanism present, but verification flags insufficient description of both
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →