Skip to main content
VCSAgriculture Forestry and Other Land UseLithuaniaVM0042

The Carbon Farming Program of Lithuania

VCS-4201 ↗

#155of 261 in Soil carbon#1020of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#13of 25 in VM0042

4.5/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

The Carbon Farming Program of Lithuania is a soil-carbon AFOLU project with VVB-confirmed additionality and a 12% buffer pool, but it is undermined by extensive material findings (24 non-conformity reports, 56 information requests), a retroactive modelling approach that prevents ground-truth correction, and a 59% reduction in the lifetime ex-ante estimate between PDD revisions. The project's reliance on a project-specific RothC-based model with validation criteria unmet for four of five scenarios creates meaningful over-crediting risk that the buffer pool only partially mitigates.

Red Flags

  • The project is retroactive (modelling backwards from 2023 to 2020), meaning overestimations in soil carbon sequestration cannot be corrected by ground-truthing, as noted in the verification report.
  • Validation criteria per VMD0053 Box 5 are not met for 4 out of 5 crop-farming-group × practice-change scenarios, as flagged in the verification report.
  • The lifetime ex-ante estimate was reduced from approximately 1.6 million tCO₂e (PDD, September 2023) to 651,365 tCO₂e (PDD, March 2026), a 59% reduction that signals significant initial overestimation.
  • 24 Non-Conformity Reports and 56 New Information Requests were raised and closed during verification, indicating pervasive documentation and methodological deficiencies.
  • The conservation tillage definition was found to be inconsistent with the cited Hyun and Yoo (2024) TRM applicability criteria, and Tillage Rate Modifiers were deemed inappropriate for the project's defined practice change.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2020
14,9352,30012,635
2021
10,135010,135
2022
12,738012,738
2023
7,82707,827
Total45,6352,30043,335

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed common-practice test

Permanence

12% buffer, no reversals, but retroactive modelling and insufficient non-permanence risk scoring

Leakage

0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' in MVR but not addressed in later validation report

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; reassessment not yet due under VCS 10-year rule

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance mechanism present, but verification flags insufficient description of both

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-04VM0042

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents