Viet Nam Improved Cookstove Project by KCM – Improved Cookstove Project in Phu Tho Province – CPA 003
#137of 150 in Cookstoves#78of 80 in Vietnam#1206of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#175of 189 in AMS-II.G
Audit Analysis
This improved cookstove project in Phu Tho Province, Vietnam, passed VCS verification with additionality confirmed and a 5% quantified leakage deduction, but is undermined by an extensive list of material findings including unaccounted gap days for replaced stoves, a thermal efficiency initially described as 'projected' rather than measured, a missing ICS distribution database, and a significant discrepancy between claimed (77,862) and verified (46,134) emission reduction figures. Multiple contradictions across documents on FPIC status, FNRB method, and benefit-sharing further erode confidence in the data integrity.
Red Flags
- Emission reduction figures differ by 41% between documents: 77,862 tCO2e in the earlier verification report versus 46,134 tCO2e in the monitoring report and later verification, raising over-claiming concerns
- Gap days for replaced stoves were not accounted for in ER calculations, inflating verified reductions
- Thermal efficiency of the 4G ICS was initially described as 'projected' rather than measured or tested, undermining the physical basis of the credit calculation
- The ICS distribution database was not submitted as supporting documentation and was absent from the ERR spreadsheet
- The same VVB team recorded onsite verification visits for two different project activities (VCS-2490 and VCS-2491) on the same date (3 August 2023), raising independence and thoroughness concerns
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 38,931 | 21,770 | 17,161 | |
| 2022 | 38,931 | 0 | 38,931 | |
| 2024 | 1,311 | 1,311 | 0 | |
| Total | 79,173 | 23,081 | 56,092 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed, test type not stated
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
5% quantified deduction with justification
Project-specific, reassessment date not stated
FPIC and grievance mechanism present but contradicted across
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →