Skip to main content
VCSEnergy demandViet Nam Registry: RegisteredAMS-II.G

Viet Nam Improved Cookstove Project by KCM – Improved Cookstove Project in Phu Tho Province – CPA 003

VCS-2490 ↗

#137of 150 in Cookstoves#78of 80 in Vietnam#1206of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#175of 189 in AMS-II.G

3.8/ 10
Integrity
4.0
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
3.5
Documentation
3.5

Audit Analysis

This improved cookstove project in Phu Tho Province, Vietnam, passed VCS verification with additionality confirmed and a 5% quantified leakage deduction, but is undermined by an extensive list of material findings including unaccounted gap days for replaced stoves, a thermal efficiency initially described as 'projected' rather than measured, a missing ICS distribution database, and a significant discrepancy between claimed (77,862) and verified (46,134) emission reduction figures. Multiple contradictions across documents on FPIC status, FNRB method, and benefit-sharing further erode confidence in the data integrity.

Red Flags

  • Emission reduction figures differ by 41% between documents: 77,862 tCO2e in the earlier verification report versus 46,134 tCO2e in the monitoring report and later verification, raising over-claiming concerns
  • Gap days for replaced stoves were not accounted for in ER calculations, inflating verified reductions
  • Thermal efficiency of the 4G ICS was initially described as 'projected' rather than measured or tested, undermining the physical basis of the credit calculation
  • The ICS distribution database was not submitted as supporting documentation and was absent from the ERR spreadsheet
  • The same VVB team recorded onsite verification visits for two different project activities (VCS-2490 and VCS-2491) on the same date (3 August 2023), raising independence and thoroughness concerns

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2021
38,93121,77017,161
2022
38,931038,931
2024
1,3111,3110
Total79,17323,08156,092

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed, test type not stated

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

5% quantified deduction with justification

Baseline

Project-specific, reassessment date not stated

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance mechanism present but contradicted across

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-30AMS-II.G

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents