VPA 22 - GHG Emission Reduction through use of Bondhu Chula (Improved Cook Stoves) in Bangladesh
GS-761 ↗ · current registry ID: GS4387
#941of 1329 in Industrial#105of 121 in Bangladesh#1369of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
A Gold Standard improved cook-stove project in Bangladesh with a VVB-confirmed additionality assessment and CCP eligibility, but undermined by an extensive list of 30+ material findings, 24 corrective actions, a project-specific baseline with no reassessment record, and a significant contradiction in the leakage deduction (0.95% in the verification report versus 5% in the monitoring report). The overall data quality and internal consistency of the monitoring and verification documents raise meaningful concerns about the robustness of the claimed emission reductions.
Red Flags
- Leakage deduction contradicts between the verification report (0.95%) and the monitoring report (5%) — a five-fold discrepancy that materially affects the net credit quantity
- 30+ material findings and 24 corrective actions identified by TÜV NORD CERT, including inconsistent emission reduction values, inconsistent DFb,Stove,y values, and missing sample calculations
- No buffer pool percentage or reversal-event data found in any available document, leaving permanence risk unquantified for a project where stoves can fail or be replaced with traditional cookstoves
- Crediting period stated as 2014–2024 in the verification report but 2021–2026 in the validation report, creating ambiguity about the applicable project duration
- total_err_exante_lifetime is not stated in any document; the 262,185 tCO₂e figure may be a per-period value rather than the lifetime estimate, preventing a reliable pro-rata delivery check
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 9,645 | 9,565 | 80 | |
| 2016 | 8,115 | 8,115 | 0 | |
| 2017 | 5,326 | 5,326 | 0 | |
| 2018 | 5,152 | 943 | 4,209 | |
| 2019 | 4,988 | 0 | 4,988 | |
| 2020 | 816 | 0 | 816 | |
| Total | 34,042 | 23,949 | 10,093 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
Quantified but 5× contradiction between documents
Project-specific, no reassessment record
FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing
CCP-eligible; CORSIA status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →