VPA 8 - GHG Emission Reduction through use of Bondhu Chula (Improved Cook Stoves) in Bangladesh
GS-745 ↗ · current registry ID: GS4373
#747of 1329 in Industrial#93of 121 in Bangladesh#1120of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
A Gold Standard cookstove project in Bangladesh with a verified combined additionality test and quantified leakage, but undermined by an extensive list of 30+ material findings and 25+ corrective actions that reveal systemic data-quality weaknesses. The project-specific baseline, absence of a buffer pool, and a contradiction in the leakage deduction figure (0.95% in the verification report versus 5% in the monitoring report) introduce moderate over-crediting risk. Overall, the project is functional but carries notable data-reliability concerns that limit confidence in the claimed emission reductions.
Red Flags
- 30+ material findings and 25+ corrective actions identified by TÜV NORD CERT indicate pervasive data-quality and internal-consistency problems across the monitoring report and ER worksheets
- Leakage deduction contradicts between the verification report (0.95%) and the monitoring report (5%) for the same monitoring period, a 5× discrepancy that undermines confidence in the leakage treatment
- No buffer pool or permanence mechanism is documented, and no baseline reassessment date is stated, leaving the project without a formal safeguard against future baseline drift
- No lifetime ex-ante emission-reduction estimate is available in the extracted record, preventing a pro-rata over- or under-delivery check against the 262,185 tCO₂e verified for the 2020–2022 period
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 3,676 | 3,676 | 0 | |
| 2015 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 0 | |
| 2016 | 7,689 | 7,689 | 0 | |
| 2017 | 4,348 | 4,348 | 0 | |
| 2018 | 4,207 | 771 | 3,436 | |
| 2019 | 4,073 | 0 | 4,073 | |
| 2020 | 667 | 0 | 667 | |
| Total | 34,660 | 26,484 | 8,176 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
no reversal events but no permanence mechanism documented
Quantified but 0.95% vs 5% contradiction between VR and MR
Project-specific baseline; no reassessment date stated
FPIC conducted, grievance mechanism present, safeguards documented
CCP-eligible; CORSIA status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →