WWF Meigu Panda Habitat Conservation Clean Cookstove Project

Audit Analysis

A Gold Standard cookstove project in China with VVB-confirmed additionality and a 5% leakage deduction, but undermined by contradictory FNRB values across documents, a missing verified ERR figure, and a project-specific baseline. The monitoring report suggests the project is outperforming its ex-ante estimate, yet the absence of a VVB-verified total and the document-quality issues (legacy Word format, garbled text) limit confidence in the reported figures.

Project Description

Red Flags

• ⚠FNRB value contradicts between the verification report (90.5) and the monitoring report (0.905), and the method is stated as 'national default' in one document but 'local field' in the PDD — the true basis of the emission factor is unclear
• ⚠Total ERR verified by the VVB is not stated in any available document; only the project participant's monitoring-report figure (20,637 tCO2e) is available, leaving the verified claim unconfirmed
• ⚠Leakage justification is described as 'quantified' in the PDD but 'not addressed' in the verification report, despite a 5% deduction being applied — the analytical basis for the deduction is inconsistent across documents
• ⚠The primary source document is a legacy Word 97-2003 file with largely garbled text content, raising concerns about data extraction reliability

Credit Vintages