Xuan Cheng Composting Project Phase II
#1038of 1329 in Industrial#946of 1084 in China#1085of 1339 in Verra (VCS)
Audit Analysis
The Xuancheng Composting Project Phase II is a registered VCS project with a confirmed investment-test additionality and an inherently low permanence risk (avoidance-type credits from avoided methane). However, the verification process surfaced an unusually large number of material findings — 13 corrective action requests and 10 clarification requests — covering calculation inconsistencies, sampling-methodology failures, and cross-document value mismatches that collectively undermine confidence in the reported emission reductions. The 0% leakage deduction and project-specific modeled baseline, combined with contradictory ERR figures across documents, leave meaningful residual risk.
Red Flags
- 13 corrective action requests and 10 clarification requests were raised and closed during verification, including failures to apply the Student's t-distribution for sample-size calculation and inconsistent PECH4,y values across the monitoring report, verification report, and spreadsheet
- Total ERR figures contradict between the validation report (51,528 tCO2e) and the monitoring report (44,058 tCO2e), and in both documents the claimed and verified values are identical, raising the question of whether independent verification actually altered the project's self-reported numbers
- Leakage deduction is 0% with a justification that shifted from 'deemed negligible' (2023 verification report) to 'quantified' (2025 verification report) without a clear methodological basis for the change
- Low extraction confidence across the document set, with one document of unknown type among the 42 files used
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 9,756 | 9,756 | 0 | |
| 2021 | 47,490 | 7,049 | 40,441 | |
| 2022 | 46,239 | 34,800 | 11,439 | |
| 2023 | 33,158 | 29,728 | 3,430 | |
| 2024 | 21,860 | 8,641 | 13,219 | |
| Total | 158,503 | 89,974 | 68,529 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
Avoidance-type credits, no reversal pathway
0% deduction, justification inconsistent across reports
Project-specific modeled baseline, not yet due for reassessm
FPIC and grievance mechanism present but documentation gaps
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →