Xuzhou Yanqun MSW Landfill Site LFG Recovery to Power Project

Audit Analysis

A standard VCS landfill gas-to-power project verified by a well-known VVB (Applus+), with VVB-confirmed additionality and no permanence risk inherent to the renewable energy application. However, the verification report lists 13 material findings—including insufficient evidence that baseline emissions were correctly quantified—and seven cross-document contradictions (notably a 46% gap in the grid emission factor) that materially weaken confidence in the credit quantity and baseline robustness.

Project Description

Red Flags

• ⚠Verification report lists 'insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the baseline emissions were correctly quantified' as a material finding, undermining confidence in the 252,983 tCO₂e verified figure.
• ⚠Grid emission factor discrepancy of 46% between the verification report (0.8587) and the monitoring report (0.58955); if the lower value is correct, credits would be substantially over-claimed.
• ⚠Contradiction on whether LFG capture is legally required (verification report: yes; monitoring report: no), which directly affects the additionality argument.
• ⚠13 material findings and 5 corrective actions required in the verification report indicate significant MRV and documentation weaknesses.
• ⚠Leakage justification is inconsistent: the verification report states 'quantified' while the monitoring report states 'deemed negligible', with a 0% deduction in both cases.

Credit Vintages