Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
ScoredCDMEE IndustryIndonesiaRegistry: RegisteredAM0009

Recovery and Utilization of Associated Gas at Pondok Tengah LPG Plant – PT. Yudistira Energy

Developer: PT Yudistira Energy

CDM-6008 ↗

#15of 111 in Indonesia#1353of 5393 in CDM (UNFCCC)#3of 21 in AM0009

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.8 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

Recovery and Utilization of Associated Gas at Pondok Tengah LPG Plant – PT. Yudistira Energy (Indonesia) recovers associated gas from oil fields that would otherwise be flared or vented and delivers it for use (recovery, transportation, processing of the associated gas and/or gas-lift gas and distribution of products thereof to end-users) under AM0009 version 7.0; registry status Registered (CDM), 1,497,863 credits issued (vintages 2016–2020). The documents name EPIC as validation / verification body. Monitoring and verification documents are in the record.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 5 registry documents (5 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish CORSIA eligibility per project.

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: methodology

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2016
799,7770799,777
2017
324,7680324,768
2019
89,859089,859
2020
283,4590283,459
Total1,497,86301,497,863

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2020AM0009 v7.0current version

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  • AM0009: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAM0009

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →