CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredGSBiogas - ElectricityThailandRegistry: RegisteredAM0022

Univanich Lamthap POME Biogas Project

Developer: Carbon Bridge Pte Ltd

GS-813 ↗ · current registry ID: GS458

Worked comparison example (English)

#81of 525 in Biogas#31of 140 in Thailand#713of 2172 in Gold Standard (GS)#4of 11 in AM0022

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.1 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-28medium confidenceLatest verified period ends: 2013-12-31

evidence: 12/12 registry documents read · 0 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

Univanich Lamthap POME Biogas Project (Thailand) avoids methane from industrial wastewater treatment and emissions from on-site energy use (biogas sent to generator sets and used for electricity generation... The Project uses an open flare... The flare is only used when there is excess biogas that cannot be combusted in the engines) under AM0022; registry status Registered (GS), 186,620 credits issued (vintages 2009–2013). The documents name SGS United Kingdom Ltd as validation / verification body. The documents estimate 43,650 tCO2e per year. The latest verification report (2013-01-01 – 2013-12-31) verifies 40,326 tCO2e. The latest achieved amount read is of an earlier period (2011-01-01 – 2012-12-31): 82,936 tCO2e, per the monitoring report. The latest monitoring period achieved 105% of its ex-ante estimate (per the monitoring report).

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 12 registry documents (12 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
28,937028,937
2010
36,887036,887
2011
49,080049,080
2012
32,197032,197
2013
39,519039,519
Total186,6200186,620

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2009AM0022 v4.0last published version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2009–2010AM0022 v4.0last published version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2011–2012AM0022 v4.0last published version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2013AM0022 v4.0last published version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • AM0022: Withdrawn (CDM / UNFCCC) · replaced byACM0014 · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAM0022
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →