Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
ScoredVCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources); Waste handling and disposalChinaRegistry: RegisteredACM0001

Haicheng Landfill Gas Power Generation Project

Developer: Haicheng Xinzhongshui Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd

VCS-2455 ↗

#20of 693 in Methane#88of 3058 in China#59of 1612 in Verra (VCS)#5of 282 in ACM0001

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.7 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

Haicheng Landfill Gas Power Generation Project (China) captures landfill gas and flares or uses it (installs a new LFG capture system in an existing Haicheng Landfill Site... The project activity captures and uses LFG for power generation... electricity generated by LFG will be exported to Northeast China Power Grid) under ACM0001; registry status Registered (VCS), 145,218 credits issued (vintages 2019–2022). The documents name LGAI Technological Center, S.A. (Applus+ Certification) as validation / verification body. The documents estimate 81,914 tCO2e per year. The latest monitoring report (26-Dec-2022 – 30-Jun-2025) reports 857 tCO2e achieved. Credits issued so far are 54% of the ex-ante estimate for the crediting period elapsed.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 24 registry documents.

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    CCP-labelled credits

    The registry marks these credits with the Core Carbon Principles label of the Integrity Council.

    Source: registry label

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-04

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2019
21,14421,1440
2020
57,99357,9930
2021
62,52462,5240
2022
3,5573,5570
Total145,218145,2180

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0001

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →