CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredVCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources); Waste handling and disposalUnited StatesRegistry: RegisteredACM0001

Midshore Regional Solid Waste Facility (MRSWF) Landfill Gas Combustion Project

Developer: Maryland Environmental Service

VCS-450 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#12of 694 in Methane#14of 1794 in United States#30of 1574 in Verra (VCS)#14of 282 in ACM0001

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 7.8 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-13medium confidenceLatest verified period ends: 2022-12-31

evidence: 50/60 registry documents read · 0 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

Midshore Regional Solid Waste Facility (MRSWF) Landfill Gas Combustion Project (United States) captures landfill gas and flares or uses it under ACM0001 version 19.0; registry status Registered (VCS), 308,213 credits issued (vintages 2009–2021). The documents name First Environment, Inc as validation / verification body. The latest verification report (01-January-2022 – 31-December-2022) verifies 6,417 tCO2e.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 60 registry documents (50 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    CCP-labelled credits

    The registry marks these credits with the Core Carbon Principles label of the Integrity Council.

    Source: registry label

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11

Credit VintagesExhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
10,33410,3340
2010
46,27546,2750
2011
33,32833,3280
2012
33,21933,2190
2013
28,64528,6450
2014
7,4197,4190
2015
18,56718,5670
2016
30,50530,5050
2017
25,11625,1160
2018
21,63421,6340
2019
17,37217,3720
2020
17,89717,8970
2021
17,90217,9020
Total308,213308,2130

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2009–2010ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  2. 2012ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  3. 2013ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  4. 2014ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  5. 2015ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  6. 2016ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  7. 2017ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  8. 2018ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  9. 2019ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  10. 2019–2020ACM0001 v19.0current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    in the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  11. 2021ACM0001the documents for this period state different versions (v3.0.1, v19.0)

    monitoring report + verification report

  12. 2022ACM0001 v19.0current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    in the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  13. Period not statedACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    issuance document

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  • ACM0001: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

Being within an ICVCM-approved version range is information only: it does not mean these credits carry the CCP label, which the registry assigns to each issuance.

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0001 version 19.0
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →