CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

Re-assessment pending

Be Energy - France - New battery regeneration center - Vaucluse

Standard
RAINBOW
Registry
RIV-2024-PROJ-50 ↗ · Withdrawn from the registry
Country
FR
Credit type
Batteries
Developer
Be-Energy
Worked comparison example (English)

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 27 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Red flagWithdrawn from the registry

The project has been taken off the registry, usually at the developer's request: for example because it would not pass validation, moved to another standard or was abandoned. It issues no further credits here.

No new credits are issued under this status. Verify any resale claim against the registry directly before paying.

Rainbow Standard: “Withdrawn”

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 2.2 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Analysed on 27 Sep 2026low confidenceLatest monitoring period ends:

evidence: 4/4 registry documents analyzed · 5 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
Rainbow Standard
Methodology
Riverse Standard Rules No methodology-specific rules: the general rules apply. Read the general rules
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v2.1 · analysed on 27 Sep 2026 · 4/4 registry documents analyzed · re-assessment under v2.2 pending

Analysis

The Be Energy battery regeneration project in Vaucluse, France, was verified by VERIFAVIA SAS under the Riverse Standard (v5.2) with a confirmed investment additionality test and no material findings. However, the project delivered only about 5% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the first monitoring year (15 tCO₂e vs. an expected ~281 tCO₂e), leakage was never addressed, and the project has since been withdrawn from the registry. These factors collectively indicate significant over-crediting risk in the original design and a project that failed to perform as modelled.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish CORSIA eligibility per project.

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Not determined

    The registry data do not say whether these credits are removals or reductions.

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

Issuance data not yet available — check back soon.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Contest this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: the reasons behind the score, the red flags and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 27 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 4 registry documents (4 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.