CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

Re-assessment pending

Distribution of ONIL Stoves – Mexico, San Felipe Usila 1

Standard
VCS
Methodology
AMS-II.G (CDM)
Registry
VCS-1216 ↗ · Registered
Country
Mexico
Credit type
Energy demand
Developer
C-Quest Capital
Worked comparison example (English)

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 2 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 3.9 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Analysed on 2 Sep 2026medium confidenceLatest monitoring period ends:

evidence: 63/63 registry documents analyzed · 5 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
Verra (VCS) How our current method reads projects of this standard
Methodology
AMS-II.G. How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v2.1 · analysed on 2 Sep 2026 · 63/63 registry documents analyzed · re-assessment under v2.2 pending

Analysis

This VCS cookstove project (AMS-II.G v03) has a VVB-confirmed additionality assessment and a quantified 5% leakage deduction, but is severely undermined by 14 cross-document contradictions, 13 material findings, and 22 outstanding corrective actions. The crediting period is stated differently in two verification reports from the same month, the ERR figures are inconsistent across documents, and the CPA implementer has withdrawn from the project. Data reliability is a major concern that limits confidence in the verified emission reductions.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Gates applied

The gates applied to this score are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 2 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 63 registry documents (63 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Stated in the project documents

    The documents claim CORSIA eligibility, but no registry label confirms it: check vintage and authorization.

    Source: project documents (not confirmed by the registry) · documents analysed on 2 Sep 2026

    Covers: what the project documents state — not a registry record

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: methodology

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label · read on 1 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2011
6,6816,6810
2012
15,3786,8258,553
2014
11,13711,1370
2015
17,76617,7660
2016
42,57542,5750
2017
45,80945,8090
2018
60,05060,0500
2019
83,67983,6790
2020
62,71737,09525,622
2021
82,1523,65068,317
2022
82,78400
2023
7,03100
Total517,759315,267102,492

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2011–2012AMS-II.G v3.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2014–2015AMS-II.G v3.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2015–2017AMS-II.G v3.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2017–2018AMS-II.G v3.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2018–2019AMS-II.G v3.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2019–2020AMS-II.G v3.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2020AMS-II.G v3.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2021AMS-II.G v12.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  9. 2021–2023AMS-II.G v12.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  10. Period not statedAMS-II.G v12.0since replaced by v14.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  • AMS-II.G: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Contest this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.