Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory

AM0015 — Bagasse-based cogeneration connected to an electricity grid

About this methodology

Bagasse-based cogeneration plants, using bagasse from the same facility, supply electricity that displaces power from the grid. The methodology accounts for the net change in fossil-fuel emissions, including the grid generation displaced.

Last published version
1.0 · source ·
Status
Withdrawn at CDM / UNFCCC · source ·
Climate outcome
Emission reductions
Activity
Heat and electricity
Official page
cdm.unfccc.int ·

How methodology v3 reads projects of this type

What CarbonMeld reads

  • shown

    Grid emission factor: the methodology sets rules for it. CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents. CM-F-AM0015-GRID-EF

    Link
  • A confirmed investment analysis A-INVEST

    The documents show a project-level additionality test, the validation confirmed it, and it is an investment analysis (a numeric test of the project's finances with and without carbon revenue).

Deductions that can apply

  • No additionality test in the documents (renewable energy) A-TEST-NOT-STATED

    Renewable energy, power generation and supply: the documents read state no additionality test. A test that the documents do not name is a different case. It takes no points.

Set by the methodology or the programme, not assessed by our current method

  • not assessed

    Leakage: the methodology sets rules for it (AM0015 v01, p. 10). Our current method does not assess it. CM-F-AM0015-LEAKAGE

    Link
  • not assessed

    Sustainability of the feedstock: the methodology sets rules for it (AM0015 v01 applicability, p. 1). Our current method does not assess it. CM-F-AM0015-FEEDSTOCK-SUSTAINABILITY

    Link
  • not assessed

    Social safeguards and consent of communities (FPIC): any such rules come from the programme, not the methodology. Our current method does not assess it. CM-F-AM0015-SAFEGUARDS-FPIC

    Link

Not applicable to this type — never a gap in our current method

The criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.

The general rules apply as well. Read the general rules.

The rules of methodology v2.2, as they were: the archived v2.2 page.

History and transitions

Top projects using AM0015

This page ranks projects using AM0015 by their CarbonMeld document-based ratings. The rank compares project ratings; it is not a rating of the methodology itself.

6 rated projects of the 35 tracked in this methodology · average rating 4.4/10 · ranked by CarbonMeld's document-based rating: additionality, quantification, permanence (where carbon is stored) and claim safety.

25 analysed project pages, A–Z →

Which registries list projects under AM0015?

In CarbonMeld's data, AM0015 projects are on one registry: CDM (35 projects, 25 registered).

RegistryProjectsRegisteredProjects list
CDM (UNFCCC)3525See the list

Counts of project records in CarbonMeld's data, with or without a CarbonMeld analysis, so they can be larger than the ranking below. «Registered» counts the records whose current registry status is «registered», as last read (12 November 2026); projects in a later status, such as awaiting verification approval, late to verify or completed, are not in that column.

#1 Grid connected bagasse based cogeneration project of Ugar Sugar Works Limited (USWL). CDM India Industrial Registry: Registered 4.4/10 #2 Alto Alegre Bagasse Cogeneration Project (AABCP) CDM Brazil Industrial Registry: Registered 4.4/10 #3 Coinbra-Cresciumal Bagasse Cogeneration Project (CCBCP) CDM Brazil Industrial Registry: Registered 4.4/10
  1. 4
    Iturama Bagasse Cogeneration Project (IBCP) CDM Brazil Biomass Registry: Registered
    4.4
  2. 5
    San Carlos Bagasse Cogeneration Project (SCBCP) CDM Ecuador Industrial Registry: Registered
    4.4
  3. 6
    Santa Elisa Bagasse Cogeneration Project (SEBCP) CDM Brazil Biomass Registry: Registered
    4.4

← All leaderboards · Full database