Leakage: the methodology sets rules for it (AM0016 v03 leakage calculations, p. 13). Our current method does not assess it. CM-F-AM0016-LEAKAGE
AM0016 — Greenhouse gas mitigation from improved animal waste management systems in confined animal feeding operations
About this methodology
Projects capture gas from animal waste and destroy it by flaring or using it for energy. The method measures greenhouse gas reductions from manure treatment without crediting displaced energy supplies.
- Issued by
- CDM (UNFCCC) · issuer's site
- Last published version
- 3.0 · source ·
- Status
- Withdrawn at CDM / UNFCCC · source ·
- Climate outcome
- Emission reductions
- Activity
- Livestock and waste
- Official page
- cdm.unfccc.int ·
- Also used by projects of
- Verra (VCS) (3 projects)
How methodology v3 reads projects of this type
What CarbonMeld reads
A confirmed investment analysis A-INVEST
The documents show a project-level additionality test, the validation confirmed it, and it is an investment analysis (a numeric test of the project's finances with and without carbon revenue).
A methane activity the law requires A-LEGAL
The rule applies to projects that capture or avoid methane. These are landfill gas, manure, wastewater, composting and coal-mine methane. They also include orphan wells, oil and gas leaks, rice, enteric methane and household biogas. The documents state that the law requires the activity. Or the documents state that a law requires the capture of the gas. An activity that the law already requires is not additional. If the documents show that the baseline already deducts the amount that the law requires, CarbonMeld takes no point.
Set by the methodology or the programme, not assessed by our current method
- not assessed
- not assessed
Social safeguards and consent of communities (FPIC): any such rules come from the programme, not the methodology. Our current method does not assess it. CM-F-AM0016-SAFEGUARDS-FPIC
Not applicable to this type — never a gap in our current method
The criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
- CM-N-GRID-EFGrid emission factor
- CM-N-BUFFERBuffer pool
- CM-N-PERMANENCE-REVERSALPermanence and reversals
- CM-N-FNRBFraction of non-renewable biomass (fNRB)
- CM-N-USAGEUsage rate of the devices
- CM-N-DURABILITY-MEASUREMENTDurability of the storage
- CM-N-FEEDSTOCK-SUSTAINABILITYSustainability of the feedstock
- CM-N-END-USE-TRACKINGTracking of the end use
The general rules apply as well. Read the general rules.
The rules of methodology v2.2, as they were: the archived v2.2 page.
History and transitions
Replaced by ACM0010
withdrawn at CDM Executive Board meeting 26 · ACM0010 version 01 of 29 Sept 2006
AM0016 | Greenhouse gas mitigation from improved animal waste management systems in confined animal feeding operations --- Version 3.0 | ACM0010 | EB 26
-
v3.0last publishedsource
Projects using AM0016
Browse 43 published projects using AM0016, listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this methodology yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects not in the pipeline or under validation are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.
Which registries list projects under AM0016?
In CarbonMeld's data, AM0016 projects are on 2 registries: CDM (40) and Verra (3). Being listed on a registry is not the same as being registered: the «Registered» column counts the projects each registry shows as registered, and credits are issued only after each verification.
| Registry | Projects | Registered | Projects list |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDM (UNFCCC) | 40 | 40 | See the list |
| Verra (VCS) | 3 | 3 | See the list |
Counts of project records in CarbonMeld's data, with or without a CarbonMeld analysis. «Registered» counts the records whose current registry status is «registered», as last read (12 November 2026); projects in a later status, such as awaiting verification approval, late to verify or completed, are not in that column.
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Rated
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: No rating yet
- Analysis: No rating yet
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: No rating yet
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
