Top ACM0010 projects
69 rated projects in this methodology · average score 5/10 · ranked by CarbonMeld's document-based assessment scores across all four dimensions: integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation. Showing the top 50 — filter the full table for the rest.
What you're looking at
This page ranks projects using ACM0010 by their CarbonMeld document-based assessment scores. The rank compares project assessments; it is not a rating of the methodology itself.
CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.
Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record. Registry / standard: CDM / UNFCCC · Gold Standard · Verra / VCS .
ACM0010: GHG emission reductions from manure management systems
Methodology issuer: CDM / UNFCCC · Official methodology page.
Livestock and waste · Emission reductions
Projects change how livestock manure is treated, on farms or at a central facility. The method measures greenhouse gas reductions compared with the manure treatment that would otherwise occur.
Source for the activity description
Version 9.0 · Active at CDM / UNFCCC · status verified on
Version and status refer to the methodology at its issuer. Individual projects may use different versions; these facts do not establish credit eligibility in other programs.
- 46.5▲+0.5
- 56.2▲+1.3
- 65.9▲+1.4
- 75.9▲+0.5
- 85.9▲+0.4
- 95.9▲+0.5
- 105.9▼-1.6
- 115.8▲+0.1
- 125.8▼-1.9
- 135.7▲+0.8
- 145.6▲+0.6
- 155.5▲+0.5
- 165.5▼-1.1
- 175.5▲+0.7
- 185.5▲+1.1
- 195.4▼-1.2
- 205.4
- 215.3▼-0.1
- 225.3▼-1.5
- 235.3▲+0.5
- 245.3▲+0.5
- 255.3▼-1.2
- 265.3▲+0.6
- 275.2▲+1.4
- 285.2
- 295.2▲+0.5
- 305.2▲+0.3
- 315.2▲+0.3
- 325.1▲+0.5
- 335.1▼-0.1
- 345.1▲+0.8
- 355▼-1.1
- 365▼-1.5
- 375▼-2.7
- 385▲+0.5
- 395
- 405▼-0.6
- 415▼-0.6
- 425▼-2.6
- 434.9
- 444.9▼-0.3
- 454.9▼-0.7
- 464.8▲+0.3
- 474.8▼-0.7
- 484.8▲+0.4
- 494.8▼-0.1
- 504.7
Rank is by document-based assessment score only. The registry status shown next to each project is a separate fact: inclusion in this ranking is not a statement of current validity or credit eligibility — projects suspended, withdrawn or terminated by their registry can still appear, with their status labelled. Read the methodology.