Vai al contenuto principale
GS Biogas - Electricity China Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

Shuangbaotai Animal Manure Management System GHG Mitigation Project in Anhui Province

GS-3359 ↗

4.9 / 10
Integrity
5.6
Transparency
4.4
Claim Safety
4.8
Documentation
4.1

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified The VVB confirms additionality, and the monitoring report states no biogas explosion or leakage during the 2023 monitoring period.

missing Leakage treatment is not addressed, and no buffer pool percentage or baseline reassessment date was found in the extracted documents.

Transparency

verified The project has a named verifier, Shenzhen CTI International Certification Co., Ltd (CTI), and a defined 2023 monitoring period.

missing Total claimed versus verified emission reductions, usage monitoring method, and other core MRV details are not stated in the available record.

Claim Safety

verified The project is a Gold Standard biogas electricity activity with safeguards mentioned, including FPIC and a grievance mechanism.

missing Leakage is not addressed and the project is marked CORSIA-eligible, which leaves some claim-safety uncertainty.

Documentation

verified Multiple official documents were used, including the PDD and monitoring report, and safeguards are described.

missing Extraction confidence is low, one document is poorly readable, and the record contains contradictions on additionality, leakage, and crediting period.

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The monitoring report confirms no biogas explosion or leakage during the 2023 monitoring period, and the VVB confirms additionality. At the same time, leakage is explicitly not addressed, and no buffer pool percentage or baseline reassessment date was found, which weakens the robustness of the integrity case.

Transparency

The project has a named verifier, Shenzhen CTI International Certification Co., Ltd (CTI), and a clearly stated monitoring period from 2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31. But key transparency items such as total claimed versus verified emission reductions, the usage monitoring method, and any FNRB method are not stated in the available documents.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is helped by the project being a Gold Standard biogas electricity activity with safeguards mentioned, including FPIC, a grievance mechanism, and benefit sharing. However, leakage is not addressed, and the project is marked CORSIA-eligible while CCP status is not stated, which leaves residual greenwashing and double-claim risk.

Documentation

The record draws on multiple official documents, including the PDD and monitoring report, and includes a named verifier. Documentation quality is weakened by low extraction confidence, one poorly readable document, and missing core fields such as verified emission totals and usage monitoring details.

Overall

I privileged the monitoring report where it was more recent and specific, especially for the 2023 monitoring period and the statement that no biogas explosion or leakage occurred. I also privileged the VVB-confirmed additionality over the conflicting investment-test reference, but the contradictions on additionality test type, leakage treatment, and crediting period reduce reliability and pull scores down. Because documentation quality is only moderate and leakage remains unaddressed, the project does not score as high-confidence despite some positive safeguards and verification.

Audit Analysis

This is a biogas electricity project with VVB-confirmed additionality and no reported reversal events in the monitoring period. However, leakage is not addressed, several key MRV fields are missing, and the record quality is weakened by low extraction confidence and multiple document contradictions.

Project Description

Developer: Profit Carbon Environmental Energy Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Type: Biogas - Electricity Size: Large Scale Methodology: ACM0010 GHG emission reductions from manure management systems Crediting period: 2020-12-26 → 2025-12-25 Estimated annual credits: 208966 tCO2e SDGs: Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth, Goal 13: Climate Action, Goal 7: Affordable and Clean Energy

Red Flags

  • Leakage is explicitly marked as not addressed, with no quantified deduction or justification found in the available record.
  • The documents conflict on additionality test type and crediting period, which reduces confidence in the consistency of the project file.

Credit Vintages

Issued Retired Available
2020
2,139 2,139 0
2021
149,037 149,037 0
2022
73,804 18,350 55,454
Total 224,980 169,526 55,454

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Provide a clear leakage assessment with quantified deduction or a strong justification for why leakage is negligible.
  • Publish a reconciled MRV package that resolves the contradictions on additionality test type and crediting period, and includes verified emission totals and usage monitoring details.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed but contradictory test record

Permanence

No reversal events reported

Leakage

Leakage not addressed

Baseline

Project baseline stated, reassessment missing

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance mechanism documented

Double-claim

CORSIA-eligible; CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-18 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti