Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Rankings · methodology

Top AM0023 projects

13 rated projects of the 30 tracked in this methodology · average score 5.9/10 · ranked by CarbonMeld's document-based assessment scores across all four dimensions: integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation.

← All leaderboards · Full database

What you're looking at

This page ranks projects using AM0023 by their CarbonMeld document-based assessment scores. The rank compares project assessments; it is not a rating of the methodology itself.

CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.

Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record. Registry / standard: CDM / UNFCCC · Verra / VCS .

AM0023: Leak detection and repair in gas production, processing, transmission, storage and distribution systems and in refinery facilities

Methodology issuer: CDM / UNFCCC · Official methodology page.

Oil and gas · Emission reductions

Projects detect and repair physical gas leaks through an enhanced leak detection and repair programme. The method measures the greenhouse gas emissions prevented by those repairs.

Source for the activity description

Version 4.0.0 · Active at CDM / UNFCCC · status verified on

Version and status refer to the methodology at its issuer. Individual projects may use different versions; these facts do not establish credit eligibility in other programs.

#1Reducing Gas Leakages within North West and other sub-areas of the Titas Gas Distribution Network in BangladeshVCSBangladeshMethaneRegistry: Registered8.6/10▲+0.2#2Reducing Gas Leakages within the Bakhrabad Gas Distribution Network in BangladeshVCSBangladeshMethaneRegistry: Registered7.6/10▲+2.7#3Reducing Gas Leakages within the Pashchimanchal Gas Distribution Network in BangladeshVCSBangladeshMethaneRegistry: Registered7.6/10▲+3.3
  1. 46.8
  2. 56.4▲+0.1
  3. 65.9▲+0.5
  4. 75.7
  5. 85.6
  6. 95.5▲+0.5
  7. 105.3
  8. 115.2
  9. 124.5
  10. 131.5

Rank is by document-based assessment score only. The registry status shown next to each project is a separate fact: inclusion in this ranking is not a statement of current validity or credit eligibility — projects suspended, withdrawn or terminated by their registry can still appear, with their status labelled. Read the methodology.