Grid emission factor: the methodology sets rules for it in some cases. CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents. CM-F-AMS-III-AK-GRID-EF
AMS-III.AK — Biodiesel production and use for transport applications
About this methodology
Projects produce biofuel from biomass or waste oils for use in transport. The method measures emission reductions against the fossil fuels displaced.
- Issued by
- CDM (UNFCCC) · issuer's site
- Version
- 3.0 · source ·
- Status
- Active at CDM / UNFCCC · source ·
- Climate outcome
- Emission reductions
- Activity
- Transport fuels
- Official page
- cdm.unfccc.int ·
- Also used by projects of
- Verra (VCS) (3 projects)
How methodology v3 reads projects of this type
What CarbonMeld reads
- shown
- shown
Leakage: the methodology sets rules for it (AMS-III.AK v03.0 Leakage section 5.4, p. 11). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents. CM-F-AMS-III-AK-LEAKAGE
A confirmed investment analysis A-INVEST
The documents show a project-level additionality test, the validation confirmed it, and it is an investment analysis (a numeric test of the project's finances with and without carbon revenue).
Figures set against the methodology's own values
- Integrity comparison
The small-scale limit is 60 kt CO2e per year (p. 4). CarbonMeld compares the project's annual estimate with it. CM-F-AMS-III-AK-SMALL-SCALE-LIMIT
small-scale limit: 60 kt CO2e per year
Set by the methodology or the programme, not assessed by our current method
- not assessed
No legal requirement for the activity: the methodology sets rules for it (AMS-III.AK v03.0 applicability para 4, p. 3). Our current method does not assess it. CM-F-AMS-III-AK-REGULATORY-SURPLUS
- not assessed
Sustainability of the feedstock: the methodology sets rules for it in some cases (AMS-III.AK applicability, p. 4). Our current method does not assess it. CM-F-AMS-III-AK-FEEDSTOCK-SUSTAINABILITY
- not assessed
Tracking of the end use: the methodology sets rules for it (AMS-III.AK v03.0 applicability para 5, p. 4). Our current method does not assess it. CM-F-AMS-III-AK-END-USE-TRACKING
- not assessed
Social safeguards and consent of communities (FPIC): any such rules come from the programme, not the methodology. Our current method does not assess it. CM-F-AMS-III-AK-SAFEGUARDS-FPIC
Not applicable to this type — never a gap in our current method
The criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
- CM-N-BUFFERBuffer pool
- CM-N-PERMANENCE-REVERSALPermanence and reversals
- CM-N-FNRBFraction of non-renewable biomass (fNRB)
- CM-N-USAGEUsage rate of the devices
- CM-N-DURABILITY-MEASUREMENTDurability of the storage
The general rules apply as well. Read the general rules.
The rules of methodology v2.2, as they were: the archived v2.2 page.
History and transitions
-
v03.0adopted 1 Mar 2018source
Broaden the applicability of biofuel and reference to TOOL12, TOOL15 and TOOL16.
-
v02.0adopted 28 Nov 2014source
This revision removes the applicability conditions related to land eligibility and project emission calculations related to the cultivation of biomass and includes reference to the approved tools.
-
v01.0adopted 30 Jul 2010source
Initial adoption.
Projects using AMS-III.AK
Browse 4 published projects using AMS-III.AK, listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this methodology yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects not in the pipeline or under validation are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.
Which registries list projects under AMS-III.AK?
In CarbonMeld's data, AMS-III.AK projects are on 2 registries: Verra (3) and CDM (1). Being listed on a registry is not the same as being registered: the «Registered» column counts the projects each registry shows as registered, and credits are issued only after each verification.
| Registry | Projects | Registered | Projects list |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verra (VCS) | 3 | 1 | See the list |
| CDM (UNFCCC) | 1 | 0 | See the list |
Counts of project records in CarbonMeld's data, with or without a CarbonMeld analysis. «Registered» counts the records whose current registry status is «registered», as last read (15 November 2026); projects in a later status, such as awaiting verification approval, late to verify or completed, are not in that column.
- Analysis: No rating yet
- Analysis: No rating yet
- Analysis: Not registered
- Analysis: Re-assessment pending
