Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Project database · methodology

GS-BIODIESEL-WASTE-OIL carbon credit projects

Browse 1 published project using GS-BIODIESEL-WASTE-OIL, listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this methodology yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.

← All leaderboards and methodology lists · Project database

What you're looking at

This is an alphabetical list of published projects using GS-BIODIESEL-WASTE-OIL. There are not yet 5 projects with a current score and a registry status eligible for ranking. Some projects may already have an assessment; each dossier shows the analysis available.

CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.

Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record. Registry / standard: Gold Standard .

GS-BIODIESEL-WASTE-OIL: Methodology for Biodiesel from waste oil/fat from biogenic origin for use as fuel

Methodology issuer: Gold Standard · Official methodology page.

Transport fuels · Emission reductions

Projects produce biodiesel from waste cooking oil or waste fat of plant or animal origin and sell it blended with fossil diesel as fuel. The method measures reductions against the fossil diesel the blend replaces.

Source for the activity description

Last published version 1.0 · Inactive / withdrawn at Gold Standard · status verified on

Version and status refer to the methodology at its issuer. Individual projects may use different versions; these facts do not establish credit eligibility in other programs.

Listed alphabetically, not ranked. A methodology leaderboard is computed automatically once 5 of its projects have a current CarbonMeld score and a rankable registry status (projects still in the pipeline or under validation are not ranked). Read the methodology.