Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory

ISOMETRIC-ENHANCED-WEATHERING — Enhanced Weathering in Agriculture

About this methodology

Silicate rock is spread on agricultural land, where carbon dioxide dissolved in water reacts with it and becomes dissolved inorganic carbon or carbonate minerals.

Version
1.3 · source ·
Climate outcome
CO2 removals
Activity
Enhanced weathering
Official page
registry.isometric.com ·

How our current method reads projects of this type

Versions of the official text these rules cover: ISO-DAC v1.3, ISO-ERW* v1.0 / 1.1 / 1.2, Edition 2022 v.2 (Oct 2024)

What CarbonMeld reads

  • Integrity shown

    Additionality: the project must show it with a test (ISO-ERW v1.2 §6.4, p. 1). CarbonMeld reads the test in the documents.CM-F-CDR-DAC-ERW-ADDITIONALITY

    Link
  • shown

    Grid emission factor: the methodology sets rules for it in some cases. CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.CM-F-CDR-DAC-ERW-GRID-EF

    Link
  • shown

    Durability of the storage: the methodology sets rules for it (ISO-DAC v1.3 summary, p. 1). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.CM-F-CDR-DAC-ERW-DURABILITY-MEASUREMENT

    Link
  • shown

    Sustainability of the feedstock: the methodology sets rules for it in some cases. CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.CM-F-CDR-DAC-ERW-FEEDSTOCK-SUSTAINABILITY

    Link

Set by the methodology or the programme, not assessed by our current method

  • not assessed

    Leakage: the methodology sets rules for it (ISO-ERW v1.2 §8.5.4, p. 1). Our current method does not assess it.CM-F-CDR-DAC-ERW-LEAKAGE

    Link
  • not assessed

    Buffer pool: the methodology sets rules for it in some cases (ISO-ERW v1.2 §9.2, p. 1). Our current method does not assess it.CM-F-CDR-DAC-ERW-BUFFER

    Link
  • not assessed

    Permanence and reversals: the methodology sets rules for it (ISO-ERW v1.2 §9.2, p. 1). Our current method does not assess it.CM-F-CDR-DAC-ERW-PERMANENCE-REVERSAL

    Link
  • not assessed

    No legal requirement for the activity: the methodology sets rules for it (Puro ERW 2022 §3.2.2, p. 20). Our current method does not assess it.CM-F-CDR-DAC-ERW-REGULATORY-SURPLUS

    Link
  • not assessed

    Social safeguards and consent of communities (FPIC): any such rules come from the programme, not the methodology. Our current method does not assess it.CM-F-CDR-DAC-ERW-SAFEGUARDS-FPIC

    Link

Not applicable to this type — never a gap in our current method

The criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.

  • Fraction of non-renewable biomass (fNRB)CM-N-FNRB
  • Usage rate of the devicesCM-N-USAGE
  • Tracking of the end useCM-N-END-USE-TRACKING

Rules our current method does not apply

  • Integrity deduction planned: not applied yet −1.5

    Direct air capture: if the plant runs on fossil energy, CarbonMeld lowers integrity by 1.5.CM-G-DAC-FOSSIL-ENERGY

    Our current method does not apply it. Some earlier (v2.1) analyses of DAC projects applied it.

    Link
  • Claim safety deduction planned: not applied yet −1.0

    Direct air capture: if the documents state no life-cycle assessment, CarbonMeld lowers claim safety by 1.0. It also shows a red flag.CM-G-DAC-NO-LCA

    Our current method does not apply it.

    Link
  • Integrity deduction planned: not applied yet −1.0

    Direct air capture: if no independent body verifies the storage, CarbonMeld lowers integrity by 1.0.CM-G-DAC-STORAGE-NOT-VERIFIED

    Our current method does not apply it.

    Link

The general rules apply as well. Read the general rules.

History and transitions

All 4 versions · current v1.3
  • v1.3currentsource

  • v1.2source

    Applicability criteria now permit carbonate feedstocks and non-agricultural settings (Section 4), while system boundary and GHG emission requirements have been updated to align with the GHG Accounting Module (Sections 7.1 and 8.5). Quantification and validation procedures have been refined, including new requirements for soil samples when using porewater-based quantification with ion exchange resin validation (Section 8.3.1), introduction of validation checks where the validation mean must exceed two standard deviations below the quantification mean (Section 8.3.1.1). Ion exchange resin validation now requires detailed procedural descriptions and saturation evaluation (Section 8.3.4). Project design flexibility has increased, allowing smaller control plots for larger projects (Section 10.1) and adding stratification options (Section 10.1.2). Climatic monitoring requirements have been streamlined, with only rainfall now mandatory while temperature, humidity, wind speed, and solar radiation are recommended (Section 10.3). The statistical framework has shifted from demonstrating significant weathering signals to direct confidence interval calculations (Appendix D), and more guidance is provided on the application rate check with detailed pass/fail criteria has been established (Section 10.4.4.3). Additional changes include removal of C and N requirements for biomass loss (Section 10.4.6.6), decrease in the sampling density requirement for soil bulk density (Table 3), integration of the River and Ocean Losses Module (Section 10.5.4), new data reporting requirements for pre-registration and lab accreditation (Section 11), and clarified guidance for projects started prior to this protocol (Section 12). The protocol also adds extensive guidance on uncertainty quantification (Appendix D), metal accumulation risk (Section 5.2), project expansion (Section 6.2), counterfactual calculations (Section 8.4), statistical testing (Section 10.1.1.2), mass change corrections (Section 10.4.6.2), non-carbonic acid weathering methods (Section 10.4.6.7), aqueous flux determination (Section 10.5.1.1.1), suitability checks (Section 10.5.2.3), aqueous measurement uncertainty (Section 10.5.3), and saturation indices for carbonic acid systems (Section 10.5.2.1). Finally, structural improvements include parameter renaming in Equations 4-5, updates to Equation 12 to account for changes in soil mass as a result of feedstock weathering, reorganization of calculation details, and general formatting enhancements.

  • v1.1source

    The changes in V1.1, made in consultation with academic partners and enhanced weathering suppliers, reflect learnings from early deployments, both from a scientific and operational standpoint. These changes are designed to increase flexibility for projects across diverse environments while maintaining a high bar of scientific rigor. Key modifications include: removal of required sampling minima; restructuring of quantification and validation measurements; modifications to requirements for control and treatment plots; and modifications to the requirements for ancillary measurements not directly used in the calculation of carbon removal.

  • v1.0source

    Initial Release.

Projects using ISOMETRIC-ENHANCED-WEATHERING

Browse 1 published project using ISOMETRIC-ENHANCED-WEATHERING, listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this methodology yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.

  • Project EarthstoneISO-1K8BE4BSR1S0Isometric StandardBrazilRegistry: Under validation
    Analysis: Analysis pending

← All leaderboards · Full database