Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory

VM0004 — Methodology for Avoided Planned Land Use Conversion in Peat Swamp Forests

About this methodology

Projects prevent planned clearing and drainage of tropical peat swamp forests. The method measures avoided emissions and carbon stock gains from retaining the forest and peat.

Last published version
2.0 · source ·
Status
Inactive at Verra / Verified Carbon Standard · source ·
Climate outcome
Emission reductions and CO2 removals
Activity
Peatland forests
Official page
verra.org ·

How methodology v3 reads projects of this type

What CarbonMeld reads

  • shown

    Buffer pool: the methodology sets rules for it (VCS Standard v4.7, p. 9). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents. CM-F-VM0004-BUFFER

    Link
  • A confirmed investment analysis A-INVEST

    The documents show a project-level additionality test, the validation confirmed it, and it is an investment analysis (a numeric test of the project's finances with and without carbon revenue).

  • Leakage not addressed (forest and land) Q-LEAKAGE-NOT-ADDRESSED

    Forest, wetland, peat, grassland and soil carbon: the documents read do not address leakage. Outside REDD+ and reforestation, the rule applies only where the methodology requires a leakage assessment. At the listing stage, the rule does not apply if the programme's listing form has no section on leakage. CarbonMeld applies this rule only where a check of the documents has confirmed its condition; without that check, the rule takes no points.

  • Where carbon is stored: the permanence start P-START

    CarbonMeld scores permanence only for projects that store carbon. Forest projects start from CCQI's grade of the programme on criterion 3.2. CCQI grades this criterion by programme, so its grade applies to every methodology of the programme. Where CCQI does not grade the programme, permanence starts at the neutral 5.0: the CDM's grade does not stand in for another programme's approach to permanence. Direct air capture with storage, biogenic emissions capture with storage, other geological storage and biochar start at the top, 8.0. The EU classes these types as permanent carbon removals. Enhanced weathering also starts at 8.0. It shares a family with direct air capture. This start is our own judgement. Concrete carbonation, ocean alkalinity, buried biomass and long-lived materials start at the neutral 5.0. These types have no class in a public source.

    Forests: CCQI's grade of the programme.

Set by the methodology or the programme, not assessed by our current method

  • not assessed

    No legal requirement for the activity: the methodology sets rules for it. Our current method does not assess it. CM-F-VM0004-REGULATORY-SURPLUS

    Link
  • not assessed

    Social safeguards and consent of communities (FPIC): the methodology sets rules for it. Our current method does not assess it. CM-F-VM0004-SAFEGUARDS-FPIC

    Link
  • not assessed

    Our current method does not check how realistic the baseline scenario of the project is. An example is the rate of deforestation that the project compares with. CM-F-VM0004-BASELINE-REALISM

    Link

Not applicable to this type — never a gap in our current method

The criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.

The general rules apply as well. Read the general rules.

The rules of methodology v2.2, as they were: the archived v2.2 page.

Projects using VM0004

Browse 1 published project using VM0004, listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this methodology yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects not in the pipeline or under validation are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.

Which registries list projects under VM0004?

In CarbonMeld's data, VM0004 projects are on one registry: Verra (1 project, 0 registered).

RegistryProjectsRegisteredProjects list
Verra (VCS)10See the list

Counts of project records in CarbonMeld's data, with or without a CarbonMeld analysis. «Registered» counts the records whose current registry status is «registered», as last read (15 November 2026); projects in a later status, such as awaiting verification approval, late to verify or completed, are not in that column.

One of these projects has no number: additionality, quantification or both have no public grade of its type of project that applies to it yet. Its page shows the analysis.

← All leaderboards · Full database