Additionality: the project must show it with a test (§1.5, p. 8). CarbonMeld reads the test in the documents.CM-F-PEATLAND-CODE-ADDITIONALITY
Peatland Code
Browse 433 published projects registered under Peatland Code, listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this standard yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.
About this standard
The Peatland Code is a voluntary certification standard for UK peatland restoration projects, launched in 2015. The IUCN UK Peatland Programme developed it and manages it. Its projects are listed in the UK Land Carbon Registry.
- Issuing body
- IUCN UK Peatland Programme · issuer's site
- Registry
- UK Land Carbon Registry · source ·
- Methodologies it issues
- 1
- Projects we list
- 433
- ICVCM Core Carbon Principles
- Not approved by the ICVCM (source) ·
- Official site
- iucn-uk-peatlandprogramme.org ·
How our current method reads projects of this standard
Versions of the official text these rules cover: pc v2.0, PEATLAND v2.1
What CarbonMeld reads
- Integrity shown
- shown
Leakage: the standard sets rules for it (§3.2, p. 15). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.CM-F-PEATLAND-CODE-LEAKAGE
- shown
Buffer pool: the standard sets rules for it (p. 13). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.CM-F-PEATLAND-CODE-BUFFER
- shown
Permanence and reversals: the standard sets rules for it (§2.3, p. 12). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.CM-F-PEATLAND-CODE-PERMANENCE-REVERSAL
- Claim safety shown
CarbonMeld quotes the rules of Peatland Code on the use of its units, in claim safety.CM-F-PEATLAND-CODE-CORSIA-RULE
Figures set against the standard's own values
- Integrity comparison
The buffer share is 20% (as stated in Peatland Code v2.1; §2.3, p. 13). Version 2.0 sets 15% (§2.3, p. 13). CarbonMeld takes the value of the version that the documents name. If they name no version, the date of the document decides. A document from 1 February 2025 takes 20%. A document from 1 June 2023 to 31 January 2025 takes 15%. CarbonMeld does not compare the share of an earlier document. CarbonMeld does not compare the share of a version that it has not read. It does not compare the share of an undated document that names no version. CarbonMeld shows the share in the documents next to it.
buffer share: 20% · source: Peatland Code v2.1, p. 13
buffer share (version 2.0): 15% · source: Peatland Code v2.0, p. 13
Deductions that can apply
- Integrity deduction −1.5
Forest, wetland, peat, grassland and soil carbon: if the documents read do not address leakage, CarbonMeld lowers integrity by 1.5 and shows a red flag. Outside REDD+ and reforestation, the gate applies only where the standard requires a leakage assessment. At the listing stage, the gate does not apply when the programme's listing form has no section on leakage.CM-G-LEAKAGE-NOT-ADDRESSED
since engine 72 Link - shown
Forest, wetland, peat, grassland and soil carbon: if the documents read do not state the buffer pool share, CarbonMeld shows a red flag. It lowers no score. Outside REDD+ and reforestation, the flag applies only where the standard requires a buffer. At the listing stage, there is no flag when the programme's listing form has no section on the buffer pool.CM-G-BUFFER-NOT-DISCLOSED
since engine 72 Link - Integrity deduction
Sometimes the UK Land Carbon Registry marks a project «Not Delivered». CarbonMeld then applies the rule for a withdrawn project. The permanence light is never green.CM-S-WCC-NOT-DELIVERED
since engine 59 Link
Set by the standard, not assessed by our current method
- not assessed
No legal requirement for the activity: the standard sets rules for it (§1.5, p. 8). Our current method does not assess it.CM-F-PEATLAND-CODE-REGULATORY-SURPLUS
- not assessed
Social safeguards and consent of communities (FPIC): the standard sets rules for it in some cases (§1.4, p. 5). Our current method does not assess it.CM-F-PEATLAND-CODE-SAFEGUARDS-FPIC
Not applicable to this type — never a gap in our current method
The criterion does not apply to this standard. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
- Grid emission factorCM-N-GRID-EF
- Fraction of non-renewable biomass (fNRB)CM-N-FNRB
- Usage rate of the devicesCM-N-USAGE
- Durability of the storageCM-N-DURABILITY-MEASUREMENT
- Sustainability of the feedstockCM-N-FEEDSTOCK-SUSTAINABILITY
- Tracking of the end useCM-N-END-USE-TRACKING
The general rules apply as well. Read the general rules.
Methodologies
Methodologies this standard issues (1)
The methodologies of our catalogue that this standard's body issues, with their official titles.
- PC-STANDARDPeatland Code
Methodologies its projects use (1)
Every methodology that a published project of this standard uses, with the number of those projects.
- PC-STANDARD433 projects
Projects, A–Z
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Not registered
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Not registered
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
The first 200 of 433 projects, A–Z.
Listed alphabetically, not ranked. A standard's leaderboard is computed automatically once 5 of its projects have a current CarbonMeld score and a rankable registry status (projects still in the pipeline or under validation are not ranked). Read the methodology.
