Skip to main content
CDMWindIndiaAMS-I.D

1.5 MW Wind Power Project in Maharashtra by M/s. Allgrow ventures

CDM-4992 ↗

#804of 1935 in Renewable energy#401of 975 in India#566of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#270of 806 in AMS-I.D

5.3/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

A 1.5 MW CDM wind project in Maharashtra with a VVB-verified investment additionality test and a jurisdictional grid-emission-factor baseline. The project's fundamental logic is sound for a renewable-energy displacement activity, but the initial submission contained 33 material findings—many relating to errors in the IRR and financial analysis underpinning the additionality case—and a contradiction in reported emission-reduction figures. Monitoring via smart meters is appropriate, yet the verified ERR figure is absent from the extracted record and several safeguards and eligibility fields remain unstated.

Red Flags

  • 33 material findings in the validation report, including incorrect IRR calculation (wrong tax rate, missing sensitivity analysis, depreciation errors) and an unclear justification for CDM revenue essentiality, all of which undermine the robustness of the investment additionality test
  • Contradiction in total ERR figures within the same monitoring report (3,210 vs 16,547 tCO₂eq), creating ambiguity about whether the claimed value is a period-specific or lifetime figure
  • Baseline method contradiction: the monitoring report (2020) describes a jurisdictional baseline while the validation report (2011) describes a project-specific baseline
  • Grid emission factor is from 2008 and was initially miscalculated using a simple average rather than a generation-weighted average

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2021
16,589016,589
Total16,589016,589

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-verified investment test, but 33 material findings on IRR and CDM-revenue essentiality

Permanence

Avoidance project (grid displacement); no reversal events reported

Leakage

0 % deduction, deemed negligible—reasonable for wind displacement

Baseline

Jurisdictional grid EF (2008); method contradiction between validation and monitoring reports

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit-sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP statuses not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-01AMS-I.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents