Skip to main content
CDMSolarSouth KoreaAMS-I.D

1.728 MW, Bundled Photovoltaic power plant in KOMIPO

CDM-3422 ↗

#1586of 1935 in Renewable energy#20of 24 in South Korea#1373of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#544of 806 in AMS-I.D

3.9/ 10
Integrity
4.0
Transparency
3.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

A 1.728 MW solar PV project under CDM (AMS-I.D v16) validated in 2011 by KSA, with an investment-test additionality assessment confirmed by the VVB. However, the validation report identified 13 material findings—including erroneous efficiency data, double-counted investment costs, and missing national FIT policy analysis—alongside a direct contradiction in the baseline method (project-specific vs. jurisdictional) and a ~50% discrepancy in claimed emission reductions between the validation report and an appendix. No monitoring or verification data was found in the extracted record, leaving the project's actual performance unconfirmed.

Red Flags

  • 13 material findings in the validation report, including wrong PV efficiency data in the financial analysis, double-counted investment in the IRR calculation, and omission of the national FIT policy from the additionality analysis
  • Baseline method contradiction: the validation report (2011-04-10) states a project-specific baseline while the PDD (2011-03-31) describes a jurisdictional baseline—a fundamental methodological inconsistency
  • Claimed emission reductions differ by approximately 50% between the validation report (12,020 tCO₂e) and an appendix (18,036 tCO₂e), with no monitoring report to resolve the discrepancy
  • No monitoring period, verified ERR, or crediting period data found in any available document—actual project performance is entirely unverified

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test VVB-confirmed but 13 material findings include errors in financial analysis and missing FIT policy

Permanence

Solar generation project; no reversal events reported; inherent permanence risk low

Leakage

0% deduction deemed negligible; reasonable for grid-displacement solar PV

Baseline

Contradiction between project-specific (validation report) and jurisdictional (PDD) baseline; 2007 grid EF

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit-sharing mentioned; no FPIC, no grievance mechanism, stakeholder process description flagged as missing

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not explicitly stated in available documents (CDM standard)

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-01AMS-I.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents