1.728 MW, Bundled Photovoltaic power plant in KOMIPO
#1586of 1935 in Renewable energy#20of 24 in South Korea#1373of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#544of 806 in AMS-I.D
Audit Analysis
A 1.728 MW solar PV project under CDM (AMS-I.D v16) validated in 2011 by KSA, with an investment-test additionality assessment confirmed by the VVB. However, the validation report identified 13 material findings—including erroneous efficiency data, double-counted investment costs, and missing national FIT policy analysis—alongside a direct contradiction in the baseline method (project-specific vs. jurisdictional) and a ~50% discrepancy in claimed emission reductions between the validation report and an appendix. No monitoring or verification data was found in the extracted record, leaving the project's actual performance unconfirmed.
Red Flags
- 13 material findings in the validation report, including wrong PV efficiency data in the financial analysis, double-counted investment in the IRR calculation, and omission of the national FIT policy from the additionality analysis
- Baseline method contradiction: the validation report (2011-04-10) states a project-specific baseline while the PDD (2011-03-31) describes a jurisdictional baseline—a fundamental methodological inconsistency
- Claimed emission reductions differ by approximately 50% between the validation report (12,020 tCO₂e) and an appendix (18,036 tCO₂e), with no monitoring report to resolve the discrepancy
- No monitoring period, verified ERR, or crediting period data found in any available document—actual project performance is entirely unverified
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
Investment test VVB-confirmed but 13 material findings include errors in financial analysis and missing FIT policy
Solar generation project; no reversal events reported; inherent permanence risk low
0% deduction deemed negligible; reasonable for grid-displacement solar PV
Contradiction between project-specific (validation report) and jurisdictional (PDD) baseline; 2007 grid EF
Safeguards and benefit-sharing mentioned; no FPIC, no grievance mechanism, stakeholder process description flagged as missing
CORSIA and CCP status not explicitly stated in available documents (CDM standard)
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →