Skip to main content
CDMHydroIndiaAMS-I.D

10.25MW Chunchi Doddi Grid-connected SHP in Karnataka, India

CDM-0103 ↗

#406of 1935 in Renewable energy#205of 975 in India#257of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#143of 806 in AMS-I.D

5.9/ 10
Integrity
6.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
6.0
Documentation
6.0

Audit Analysis

A 10.25 MW grid-connected small hydro project in Karnataka, India, verified under CDM methodology AMS-I.D. with a jurisdictional grid-emission-factor baseline. The project shows conservative under-delivery relative to ex-ante expectations and no reversal risk, but several key monitoring and safeguards details are absent from the extracted record, and four inter-document contradictions (largely explainable by units, database versions, or reporting-period differences) introduce moderate data-reliability uncertainty.

Red Flags

  • Four contradictions between the 2012 validation report and the 2023 monitoring report (ERR magnitude, baseline characterisation, leakage justification wording, grid EF units) reduce confidence in data consistency across the project's documentation set.
  • No verified ERR figure was found in the extracted record; only a claimed figure of 5,907 tCO₂e is available, making independent cross-checking impossible.
  • FPIC and grievance-mechanism details are not documented in the available records, despite safeguards being mentioned and benefit-sharing described.
  • The monitoring period covers only about 10 months (Jan–Oct 2012) of a 7-year crediting period, limiting the evidentiary base for performance claims.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2006
25,038025,038
2007
23,410023,410
2008
21,107021,107
2009
26,366026,366
2012
32,653032,653
2013
54,888054,888
Total183,4620183,462

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test present; VVB confirmation not explicit in record

Permanence

Hydro generation – no reversal risk; no events reported

Leakage

0 % deduction, justified as negligible/quantified – appropriate for SHP

Baseline

Jurisdictional grid EF (CEA v7.0), updated per material findings

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned, benefit-sharing described; FPIC & grievance mechanism undocumented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both unstated – dual-channel risk unassessed

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-01AMS-I.D.

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents