10 MW Wind Power Project In Maharashtra By Deepak Fertilizers And Petrochemicals Corporation Limited

Integrity

The validation/verification record indicates additionality was confirmed by the VVB using an investment test. The baseline is project-specific (project baseline), and the timing of any baseline reassessment is not stated in the extracted record. Leakage is a key weakness: the later monitoring report (2021-07-01) says leakage was not addressed, while an earlier monitoring report (2010-01-29) indicates leakage was quantified, and no leakage deduction percentage is found.

Transparency

The extracted record identifies the VVB (LGAI Technological Center, S.A. / Applus+ Certification) and provides a monitoring period (2013-01-01 to 2019-10-06). However, transparency is reduced by major inconsistencies across document versions on core accounting inputs/outputs, including total ERs and the grid emission factor. While the extracted record shows no material findings and no corrective actions, the contradictions make it harder to independently reconcile what was actually validated/verified.

Claim Safety

The project is explicitly marked as not CORSIA-eligible, which lowers the risk of claims being used simultaneously in CORSIA-related contexts. Nonetheless, over-crediting/claims risk remains because different validation report versions disagree on total ERs (281,345 vs 64,883) and the grid emission factor (0.62286 vs 0.82), both of which can materially change credited volumes. CCP status is not stated in the extracted record, leaving uncertainty about alignment with higher-integrity claim frameworks.

Documentation

Documentation coverage is relatively strong: the extracted record includes a monitoring report, validation report, and PDD, with 13 documents used and high extraction confidence. The record also indicates no material findings and no corrective actions required. However, the presence of multiple contradictions across documents (including crediting period and key quantification parameters) suggests version control and record consistency issues that reduce documentation quality.

Overall

Overall scoring is pulled down primarily by internal inconsistencies across official documents and unclear leakage treatment. For the ER totals and grid emission factor contradictions, the more recent validation report version (2021-07-06) is privileged over the earlier version (2021-05-08) because it is later-dated and likely reflects an updated/issued version; however, the existence of two conflicting values still indicates reliability risk and reduces scores. For leakage and safeguards/grievance contradictions, the later monitoring report (2021-07-01) is privileged as the more recent operational record, but the shift from “quantified” to “not addressed” (and from safeguards/grievance absent to present) signals inconsistent reporting that warrants conservative scoring.