CDMWindIndiaAMS-I.D

13.75 MW wind power project in Davangere, Karnataka, India.

CDM-3700 ↗

#797of 1935 in Renewable energy#393of 975 in India#565of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#267of 806 in AMS-I.D

5.3/ 10
Integrity
7.0
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
3.0

Scored2026-08-24medium confidence

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Audit Analysis

A 13.75 MW CDM wind project in Karnataka with a standard jurisdictional grid baseline and VVB-confirmed combined additionality test. The project type carries inherently low reversal and leakage risk, but the available record is limited to the validation stage with no monitoring or verification reports, and a significant reporting inconsistency exists between the PDD and validation report on the total expected ER figure.

Red Flags

  • The PDD (April 2017) reports a total expected ER of 195,454 tCO2 while the validation report (June 2017) reports 27,922 tCO2; although 27,922 × 7 years = 195,454 suggests the figures are consistent on an annual-vs-total basis, the inconsistent labelling as 'total' in both documents is a documentation reliability concern.
  • No monitoring or verification reports are present in the extracted record, so actual performance against the ex-ante estimate cannot be assessed.
  • Minimum extraction confidence is rated low, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable, reducing confidence in the completeness of the data.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2013
50,357050,357
2015
47,758047,758
2018
72,942072,942
Total171,0570171,057

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test, VVB-confirmed

Permanence

Avoidance project, no reversal risk

Leakage

0% deemed negligible, appropriate for wind

Baseline

Jurisdictional grid EF, standard method

Safeguards

Mentioned but FPIC and grievance mechanism not documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-24AMS-I.D
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents →