CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredVCSavoidanceIndonesiaRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

210 MW Musi Hydro Power Plant, Bengkulu

Developer: PT. PLN (Persero)

VCS-487 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#673of 5087 in Renewable energy#8of 123 in Indonesia#485of 1608 in Verra (VCS)#515of 3484 in ACM0002

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.5 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-11medium confidenceLatest verified period ends: 2020-12-31

evidence: 29/37 registry documents read · 0 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

210 MW Musi Hydro Power Plant, Bengkulu (Indonesia) generates grid-connected renewable electricity (run-of-river hydro power plant) under ACM0002 version 17.0; registry status Registered (VCS), 7,607,796 credits issued (vintages 2009–2020). The documents name TÜV NORD as validation / verification body. The latest verification report (01-October-2017 – 31-December-2020) verifies 2,705,815 tCO2e.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 37 registry documents (29 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-25

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
421,938320,762101,176
2010
691,297294,441396,856
2011
517,92769,858448,069
2012
534,274526,1998,075
2013
578,211576,8381,373
2014
516,299514,9831,316
2015
477,27974,356402,923
2016
639,358608,90130,457
2017
774,968612,339162,629
2018
803,211787,83815,373
2019
712,808712,023785
2020
940,226927,39212,834
Total7,607,7966,025,9301,581,866

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2009–2010ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2010–2013ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2013–2016ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2016–2017ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2017–2020ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+134)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

Marketplaces

Carbonmarksold out

checked on 25 Oct 2026

↗
+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002 version 17.0
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →