Vai al contenuto principale
GS Other India Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

2x50 MW Orange Suvaan Solar Photovoltaic Power Project in Maharashtra, India

GS-1037 ↗

4.2 / 10
Integrity
5.2
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
3.2
Documentation
4.0

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified Additionality confirmed by the VVB (verification report, 2024-12-31).

missing Leakage justification not addressed despite a 0% leakage deduction and reversal events not addressed (monitoring/validation reports, 2024).

Transparency

verified VVB named (VKU Certification Private Limited) and monitoring period specified (2024-01-01 — 2024-12-31).

missing Core quantitative fields (total ERR claimed/verified, usage monitoring method, FN/RB) not stated in available documents and evidence list is unclear.

Claim Safety

missing Project is CORSIA-eligible, increasing double-claim risk (field: corsia_eligible = true).

missing Usage rates and fossil/non-fossil baseline adjustment values not stated, and leakage justification is missing — elevates over-crediting risk.

Documentation

verified A substantial number of documents were extracted (25 documents used) and baseline was reassessed in 2024.

missing Minimum extraction confidence is low and evidence_docs entries are 'unknown'; multiple corrective actions were raised by the verifier.

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The verification report confirms additionality using an investment test and the VVB validated it (verification report, 2024-12-31), and the baseline was reassessed in 2024 which supports baseline validity. However, the project applies a 0% leakage deduction while the leakage justification is reported as not addressed in the extracted record (monitoring/validation documents, 2024), and reversal events are explicitly not addressed. The VVB raised 17 findings including CARs and requested corrective actions; although reported as resolved, their existence reduces confidence in robustness.

Transparency

The VVB is named (VKU Certification Private Limited) and a clear monitoring period is provided (2024). But essential numeric disclosures—total emissions reductions claimed/verified, usage monitoring method, FN/RB methodology values—are not found in the extracted records. Evidence document identifiers are unknown and minimum extraction confidence is low, which limits verifiability of reported facts.

Claim Safety

The project is marked CORSIA-eligible, creating dual-claim risk. Key parameters that guard against over-crediting (fossil/non-fossil baseline adjustments, usage rates, and verified ERR figures) are not present in the extracted record, and leakage justification is missing despite a 0% leakage deduction. These gaps raise moderate-to-high risk of overstated claims.

Documentation

Twenty-five documents were used and the validation/monitoring reports are recent (doc date 2024-12-31), which is positive. However, the min extraction confidence is low (some documents poorly readable), evidence_docs are unspecified, and the verifier listed multiple corrective actions including missing calibration details and missing invoices. These issues lower the documentation score.

Overall

I privileged the more recent 2024-12-31 values when contradictions exist because they are the latest verification/validation entries and likely reflect updates made by the project/VVB (contradictions entries include older dates such as 2023-06-29 and 2023-10-05). Specific contradictions addressed: benefit sharing (privileged documented 'described' on 2024-12-31), FPIC (privileged 'conducted' on 2024-12-31), leakage justification (privileged 'not addressed' on 2024-12-31), reversal events (privileged 'not addressed' on 2024-12-31), and crediting period (privileged the 2024–2029 period stated on 2024-12-31). The low extraction confidence and the verifier's corrective actions reduce trust in the record; these concerns drove downward adjustments to transparency, claim safety and documentation. The weighted average yields an overall score of 4.2.

Audit Analysis

Project shows confirmed additionality and a recent baseline reassessment, but significant gaps remain on leakage, reversal treatment, and monitoring data. Several corrective actions were raised by the verifier and extraction confidence is low, which undermines data reliability and claim safety.

Project Description

Developer: Orange Renewable Power Pvt Ltd Type: Other Size: Large Scale Methodology: ACM0002 Grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources Crediting period: 2017-06-16 → 2029-06-15 Estimated annual credits: 164869 tCO2e SDGs: Goal 13: Climate Action, Goal 7: Affordable and Clean Energy, Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth

Red Flags

  • Leakage justification not addressed while a 0% leakage deduction is applied
  • Reversal events are not addressed in the available documents
  • Key monitoring figures (ERR, usage rates, FN/RB) not provided in extracted record
  • Minimum extraction confidence flagged as low (some source documents were poorly readable)

Credit Vintages

Issued Retired Available
2017
84,100 84,100 0
2018
209,222 206,891 2,331
2019
202,262 165,482 36,780
2020
190,676 36,544 154,132
2021
191,879 1,104 190,775
2022
181,355 0 181,355
Total 1,059,494 494,121 565,373

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Provide clear leakage analysis and justification (or apply a conservative leakage deduction) and document it in monitoring/verification reports.
  • Publish the missing monitoring data (total ER claimed/verified, usage monitoring method, FN/RB values, calibration and invoices) and ensure source documents are legible so extraction confidence is not low.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed

Permanence

reversal treatment unclear

Leakage

0% deduction but justification missing

Baseline

project-specific, recently reassessed

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance present

Double-claim

CORSIA-eligible

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-24 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti