3 MW (2* 1.5 MW) Bundled Wind Power Project at Rajasthan
#121of 1935 in Renewable energy#58of 975 in India#68of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#42of 806 in AMS-I.D
Audit Analysis
A standard CDM wind power project in Rajasthan using the well-established AMS-I.D methodology, with VVB-confirmed additionality via an investment test and a jurisdictional grid-emission-factor baseline. The project delivered approximately 86% of its pro-rata expected reductions over the monitoring period, indicating conservative crediting. Main gaps are the absence of documented FPIC, grievance mechanism, and CORSIA/CCP eligibility status, plus a baseline-method contradiction between the validation and monitoring reports.
Red Flags
- Baseline method is described as 'project' in the 2012 validation report but 'jurisdictional' in the 2021 monitoring report — a terminology inconsistency that, while likely reflecting the same grid-EF approach, reduces confidence in baseline clarity.
- No FPIC, grievance mechanism, or stakeholder consultation evidence is documented in the extracted record, despite CDM requirements for stakeholder engagement.
- CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated in any available document, leaving dual-channel risk unassessed.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 31,435 | 0 | 31,435 | |
| Total | 31,435 | 0 | 31,435 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
Avoidance project, no reversal risk
0% with valid justification for grid wind
Jurisdictional grid EF, but method label contradicts between
Mentioned but no FPIC or grievance mechanism documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
