Skip to main content
CDMSolarSouth KoreaAMS-I.D

8.85MW SECHAN POWER PV(photovoltaic) power plant(a bundling project which consists of 7different PV power plants)

CDM-2552 ↗

#1406of 1935 in Renewable energy#18of 24 in South Korea#1137of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#463of 806 in AMS-I.D

4.5/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

A bundled 8.85 MW solar PV project in South Korea under CDM with a jurisdictional baseline and VVB-confirmed investment additionality test, but undermined by a major non-conformity on CDM incentive consideration, a significant under-delivery (only 5 of 7 plants built, actual emissions reductions far below the PDD estimate), and a large unexplained discrepancy between the PDD and monitoring-report ERR figures. The project type (solar) carries inherent permanence and low leakage risk, but the additionality weakness and data gaps limit confidence.

Red Flags

  • Major non-conformity: evidence that CDM incentive was seriously considered prior to project start was initially missing, undermining the investment additionality test
  • Only 5 of 7 planned PV plants were built due to financial constraints, yet the PDD estimated 58,395 tCO2e while the monitoring report records only 3,537 tCO2e for the period — a roughly 94% gap that is not fully explained by the missing plants
  • Grid emission factor contradiction: 0.6096 tCO2/kWh in the 2010 monitoring report versus 0.6817 in the 2008 appendix, a 12% difference that materially affects credit volume
  • 97 MWh of electricity imported from KEPCO was not accounted for in the registered PDD, creating a baseline integrity gap

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed but major non-conformity on CDM incentive cons

Permanence

Solar PV avoidance project, no reversal events reported

Leakage

0% deduction, deemed negligible for grid-displacement techno

Baseline

Jurisdictional baseline, grid EF from 2007, value contradict

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned but FPIC, grievance mechanism, and bene

Double-claim

CORSIA eligibility and CCP status both not stated in availab

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25AMS-I.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents