Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
ScoredACRForest CarbonCALIFORNIA, USRegistry: RegisteredARB-US-FOREST

American Carbon Registry project ACR-182, United States

Developer: Hanes Ranch Inc

ACR-182 ↗

#147of 432 in Water#451of 1795 in United States#312of 975 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)#55of 250 in ARB-US-FOREST

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.4 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

ACR-182 (CALIFORNIA, US) is an improved forest management project under the Compliance Offset Protocol U.S. Forest Projects (registry status Registered). 10 Offset Verification Statements are in the record (3 as flattened forms whose values cannot be read); the readable ones cover 2012-03-25 – 2019-08-25 and are all Positive by the form's rule (no qualifying statement, which an adverse opinion requires; the opinion box itself is not read). The statement for 2015-08-26 – 2016-08-25 (-24,705 tCO2e) verifies net emissions (total GHG reductions below zero): no offset credits for that reporting period. Under the protocol a negative result after credits were issued is a reversal (the registry records credits for earlier vintages); whether it was compensated is not stated in the documents read. The registry records 171,915 credits issued across 9 vintages.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 33 registry documents (27 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-18

Credit VintagesExhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2013
107,21400
2014
10,05100
2015
10,05100
2017
12,30300
2018
10,99600
2019
11,03000
2020
90200
2021
8,63200
2022
73600
Total171,91500

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceARB Compliance Offset Protocol: U.S. Forest Projects

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →