Skip to main content
ACRIndustrial Process EmissionsNEW YORK; PENNSYLVANIA; WASHINGTON, USGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Advanced Refrigeration - ARS2021001

ACR-742 ↗

#60of 108 in Water#179of 345 in United States#79of 147 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)

4.9/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

A US-based advanced refrigeration retrofit project under ACR with VVB-confirmed additionality and a reasonable leakage treatment, but undermined by six material documentation findings, four inter-document contradictions (including a baseline-method and crediting-period discrepancy), and several key MRV parameters left unstated. The project is functional but its documentation quality and data consistency fall well below the standard expected for a verified credit.

Red Flags

  • Four contradictions across documents, including a baseline-method conflict (project-specific in the validation report vs. jurisdictional in the PDD) and a crediting-period mismatch (starting 2021-03-10 in the monitoring report vs. 2021-10-03 in the validation report), raising data-reliability concerns.
  • Six material findings in the verification report, including arithmetic errors in the Project Plan capacity table, use of an outdated ACR template version, and missing risk-factor discussion for the aggregated project scope.
  • All three ERR figures (claimed, verified, ex-ante lifetime) are identical at 39,881 tCO₂e, and the full lifetime estimate was delivered within a ~5.7-month monitoring window of a 10-year crediting period, which warrants scrutiny of whether the ex-ante estimate was properly calibrated.

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2021
33,07633,0760
2022
6,8056,8050
Total39,88139,8810

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test, VVB-confirmed

Permanence

Not applicable – industrial retrofit, no carbon-stock reversal risk

Leakage

0% deduction, deemed negligible – consistent with contained refrigerant

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; method contradicted across documents

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned but FPIC and grievance mechanism not detailed

Double-claim

CCP and CORSIA status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-12General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents